Laserfiche WebLink
H. <br />p <br />yi: <br />[>*• <br />fl-. ' <br />m <br />i-ia-.' <br />f? <br />K--' <br />> <br />^,.. <br />i. '. <br />fe- <br />|r'' <br />¥m. <br />^'?- <br />lii-'-1^; <br />ty^-* <br />File #1693 <br />October 23» 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />Council Is advised to allow the applicant to address each of <br />these necessary findings. Note that the wording of the moratorium is <br />such that the Council is not mandated to grant a variance^ but may <br />grant a variance at Council's discretion. <br />(ketch Plan Review - Confonity with Proposed Shoreland Regulations <br />Please review pages 2, 3 and 4 of the October 16th memo. The <br />initial sketch plan includes the following variances which need to be <br />addressed t <br />A.Wetland encroachment by the proposed private road. <br />B. Lot width at the "shoreline" for Lots 1 and 5. <br />C. Lot width at 50' street setback for Lots 2 and 4. <br />Regarding the wetland encroachmentr this occurs where the <br />proposed road enters Fox Street. There is already a private driveway <br />in this area which would have to be significantly expanded to create <br />the private roadbed. Some wetland encroachment is probably <br />unavoidable in order for this road to be created. <br />Lot width standard for this 2 acre zone 200'. If these are <br />considered lakeshore lotSr then the Lake Use Conur.j.ttee has recommended <br />that lot width be measured at the "shoreline" and at the required <br />structural setback from the shoreline. Lot lines for Lots 1 and 5 can <br />likely be revised to accommodate the required widths. <br />If these are not considered as lakeshore lots» then the lot width ^ <br />would be sieasured at the 50' street setback. In this caser Lots 2 and <br />4 would not meet the 200* standard* but the line between Lots 2 and 3 <br />can be revised to allow Lot 2 to conform. Lot 4 is a cul-de-sac lot <br />and the City has often granted lot width variances for cul-de-sac lots <br />in the past. <br />An additional issue is that the building envelope for Lot 2 is <br />extremely limited* if the Shoreland Regulations ultimately result in a <br />RD classification for Tanager Lake and the need for 100' setbacks from <br />the Ordinary High Water Mark. It may be possible to revise <br />drainfield sites to give a small degree of flexibility for house <br />construction on this site* but under the current plan it is fairly <br />inflexible. <br />lor V at- cut.-t>e-sAc