My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1990-1996 Microfilm
>
1991
>
10-28-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2024 1:42:05 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 1:39:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i::S' <br />r <br />MXNUTIS OF THI RIOULAF ORONO COUNCSL HlfTZNO - OCTOICR 14, 1091 <br />#1684 > CONT. <br />Graham noted the current structure 1r. In dire need of repair. <br />They are proposing to reside and reroof the entire structure. <br />Habusth noted that the majority of this property Is located <br />within the 0-75’ 2one. She noted there will be a reduction In <br />'ardcover of 3.5% by reducing the size of the circular drive. <br />Habusth added that the circular drive Is the only turnaround on <br />this pennisula. therefore It would be beneficial to retain the <br />turnaround for emergency vehicles. <br />Graham nvted there Is an easement filed In the chain of title to <br />use this turnaround. He advised that the circular drive has been <br />reduced by approximately 1,000 s.f. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant how soon he Intended to proceed with <br />construction on the residence. <br />Graham Indicated they would be starting right away. <br />Jabbour noted that per the resolution approval, hardcover <br />reductions would have to be made prior to issuance of the <br />building permit. He asked If this condition could be tied to the <br />Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. <br />Habusth explained there would not be a Certificate of Occupancy <br />Issued because It Is an existing residence, but perhaps It could <br />coincide with the first Inspection. <br />Barrett advised that by Issuing the permit prior to the removals, <br />the City's remedies to ensure removal have been weakened. <br />Habusth asked Graham If they will be living there during <br />construction, to which he Indicated they would not. She <br />explained a Certificate of Occupancy could then be Issued as no <br />one would be living there during the construction and the <br />Issuance of such could be conditioned on the removals of <br />hardcover. <br />Barrett noted that the City In the past has not allowed <br />residential construction to be tied to a bond. He suggested an <br />Irrevocable letter of credit might be acceptable along with a <br />landscape plan which could not require discretion on the part of <br />the City If they would have to finish the project. <br />Graham noted that It would be best to do the removals of <br />hardcover In the spring and to then repave the road. <br />Habusth noted they could change the resolution to reflect the <br />need for a developer's agreement and a letter of credit written <br />for 150% of proposed Improvements and a landscape plan showing <br />the proposed Improvements.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.