Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA24-000037 <br />15 July 2024 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in <br />any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested variance in this <br />unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. <br /> <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to <br />alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The requested variance is necessary and does not merely serve as a <br />convenience to the Applicants. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions <br />imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. <br />No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land <br />is located. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />The applicants have submitted acknowledgment forms from neighbors (Exhibit K) no public comments have been <br />received. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a <br />reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential <br />character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions to mitigate the impacts created by the <br />granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the average lakeshore setback as applied. <br /> <br /> <br />159