Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />TH 12 CORRIDOR STUDY <br />Citizen’s Committee Meet>ug <br />September 24,1991 <br />Page 2 <br />12 bottleneck in Long Lake. <br />Comments from the Audience were then received. Questions and comments received and <br />addressed included the following: <br />-location of the park in Orono impaaed by Alternatives 2 and 2A (Baker Park) <br />~ request to consider maintenance costs on new roadway as an evaluation factor <br />-consideration of frontage road development in Long Lake for Alternatives 2A and 2B <br />-location of the "original" south bypass alternative compared with the location of the <br />current south bypass alignment in Orono <br />-interchange locations (local access) for Long Lake <br />i;'; <br />I <br />, r-\' <br />■j <br />t: <br />I <br />-upgrade of CR 116 in Medina <br />~ effect/impaa of new transportation commissioner on the commitment to continue EIS <br />for project <br />-- the time at which the costs of the alternative begin to drive the decision-making process <br />-differences in impacts between Alternatives 2 and 2A <br />project mapping stams <br />-cost comparisons betAeen the alternatives (why are the Alternative 2 ’s so much more) <br />~ non-linkage at the western terminus of the project with TH 55 <br />~ upgrade of CR 6 through Orono (as a separate Hennepin County issue) <br />The next meeting was set for October 22, 1991. A draft of the Draft Scoping Decision <br />Document (DSDD) will hopefully be available at this meeting. <br />The meeting adjourned at approximately 5:20 p.m. <br />RDH/rdh <br />14170/cttiiitii.sep