|
DRAFT
<br />TH U CORRIDOR STUDY
<br />Policy Cominittee Meeting
<br />Maple Plain City Hall
<br />September IS, 1991
<br />Memhera Pre8''ntt T. Humbert, B. Bauman, B. Swartwood, D. Poss, M. Johnson, M. Alger,
<br />B.Peterson
<br />Alternatea Present! D. Harmon, M. Butler
<br />nthmn L Dallam, R. Harris, S. Hay, P. Zietlow, R. Moorse, J.D. Goetten, R.
<br />Peterson, A. Cosgrove, M. Swan, P. Swanson, S. Luse, J. Waight, K. Richardson, D. Plugner,
<br />D.Stenson, J. Jensen, J. Hoeft, J. Bems, B. Griffith, J. Reuter, E. Moriarty, M. Larson, D.
<br />Painter, L. Olson, P. Pittel, S. Pittel, K. Madson, A. Reckner, F. Haug, M. Underhill, A,
<br />Pederson, L. Scalt M. Hartfiel, B. Nowak, K. Wenger, B. Alexander, L. Drawert, D. Molin,
<br />J, Pederson, A. Behmer, B. Becker, B. Hentges, D. Belimer, R. Holm, J. James, P. Schoon
<br />rTtair Johiison called the meeting to order at 5:37 p.m. He explained that the previous
<br />month’s meeting minutes would be distributed at this meeting for committee review. He
<br />also ^irplalni^t the typical TH 12 Corridor Study meeting schedule and policy of the agenda
<br />for the benefit of the audience.
<br />Status of Lavonts
<br />S.Hay explained that all layouts were mailed out except 2E (available tonight) and Alt 2
<br />for Long Lake (and Maple Plain).
<br />Cntnmgnt< nn T .avniits’
<br />B.Swartwood requested to have the original South Bj^ass Corridor restudied (Mn/DOT*s
<br />1960’s layout) because cities have based Comprehensive Plans on it Hay/L. Dallam said
<br />that the currem South Bypass alternatives are very similar to the 1960*s layout Hay said
<br />that Mn/DOT would look at it individually and discuss the possibility of restudying it with
<br />the City of Long Lake. B. Peterson said that Orono removed the original South Bypass
<br />Corridor from their Comprehensive Plan Update in 1980.
<br />Impact Evaluation Criteria
<br />Dallam distributed a revised impact evaluation criteria sheet for the project and said that
<br />each criterion was developed with respect to the goals, issues, and concerns previously
<br />identified by each municipality, the counties, and the State to measure the potential impacts
<br />of each alternative with the most objective evaluation possible, with the available
<br />information.
<br />Dallam asked the Committee if the evaluation criteria were adequate.
<br />The Chair asked that cemeteries be added to evaluation criteria (as a social impact).
|