My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
10-14-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2024 9:46:31 AM
Creation date
7/16/2024 9:41:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 <br />(#9) #1679 WILLIAM F. MILLER <br />2691 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING <br />9:16 - 9:30 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication <br />noted. <br />'d Certificate of Mailing was <br />William Miller was present for this application. <br />Gaffron briefly reviewed that the applicant Is proposing to <br />remove an existing single car garage and a portion of the parking <br />aroa, and Install a larger garage witn side opening doors.He <br />noted that the second part of this application ' Involves <br />structural maintenance of an existing 8’x8' bathhouse. He <br />explained that the building Inspectors were on the site to review <br />the garage proposal and noticed the work being done on the bath <br />house.They noted that the entire lower level had been removed <br />apart and new posts were Installed In the corners and a new slab <br />was Installed or at least new footings.The applicant was told <br />to stop work on the project, but he continued to finish the <br />project regardless. Gaffron noted that the code states that a <br />non-conforming structure within the 0-75' zone cannot be Improved <br />more than 50% of Its value.It was the building Inspector's <br />contention that the inprovements exceeded the 50% of the <br />valuation. <br />Johnson asked If the platform and stairs are new. <br />Miller stated that they pre-date his ownership and that he <br />has recently washed and stained them so they may look newer than <br />they really are.He noted that since he !s a new owner, he was <br />unaware of the restrictions on the bathhouse. He also noted that <br />he has expended $359 for the repairs to the boathouse and did not <br />feel that It exceeded 50% of the value.He explained that the <br />Inspector told the contractor to stop work on all structural <br />work.He noted that at that time the siding was not on but all <br />other work was done and because of high winds, he went ahead and <br />put the siding on to prevent collapse of the entire structure. <br />He also felt that putting the siding on did not constitute <br />structural work. <br />Cohen asked If the hardcover could be further reduced. <br />Miller Instructed that the patio could be taken out by the <br />back door which results In 70 s.f., and ho could take out all the <br />sidewalks from the house to the garage and put In stepping stones <br />which would result In reduction of 56 s.f. He noted that It Is a <br />matter of practicality, as If stepping stones are Installed, you <br />cannot shovel snow. <br />Rowlette asked about the dog run. <br />Miller noted that It was not added In the calculation <br />because It has a dirt floor.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.