My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-23-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
09-23-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2024 9:34:34 AM
Creation date
7/15/2024 9:30:48 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A RB80L0TI0N GRANTING <br />VARIANCES TO <br />MIIHICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.22, SUBDIVISIONS I AND 2 <br />PILE #1608 <br />NHEREAS, Jeunes Hartzell (hereinafter "the applicant") <br />ia the owner of the property located at 2987 Casco Point Road <br />within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally <br />described as follows: <br />Lot 2, Bloclc 1/ Hartzell Addition, Hennepin County, <br />Minnesota (hereinafter "the property"); and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for <br />variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 <br />and 2 to permit the construction of a pool and associated patios <br />and retaining walls, such construction encroaching 25* past the <br />average lakeshore setback line where no encroachment is normally <br />allowed and such construction increasing hardcover on the <br />property to a level in excess of the 25% hardcover normally <br />allowed in the 75''250* zone. <br />HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />This ipplication was reviewed as Zoning Pile #1608. <br />2.The property is located in the LR-lC Single Family <br />Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br />3.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on August 19 and September 16, 1991, and on a vote of 4 <br />to 1 recommended approval of the proposed variance <br />based upon the following findings: <br />No portion of the proposed pool, retaining walls, <br />or associated fencing will extend more than 6 ’ <br />above grade, hence due to the topography and the <br />distance of the proposed pool from neighboring <br />residences, the proposed average lakeshore setback <br />encroachment will ..ave no negative impact on <br />neighboring properties. <br />Page 1 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.