Laserfiche WebLink
�Ot� CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> y*C.-�s. NO. 7486 <br /> K£ <br /> A6. In considering this application for CUP and variance, the Council has considered the <br /> advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br /> traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on <br /> values of property in the surrounding area. <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: <br /> The City Council may approve a CUP for the construction of retaining walls as long as the <br /> walls are: <br /> B1. Designed to correct an established erosion problem; the applicant indicated that the <br /> new walls are necessary to provide stability at the base of the bluff just above the rip <br /> rap. They assert that the use of the wall will avoid the need to grade further inland to <br /> create stability. The Applicant has provided a landscape plan for the slope which <br /> includes deep-rooted plants and shrubs in addition to the proposed walls. This <br /> criterion has been met; and <br /> 82. Suitable given the demonstrated need; A global stability analysis by Ronald W. <br /> Vickery, PE was provided, The analysis notes a retaining wall would improve the <br /> stability of the bluff. This criterion has been met; and <br /> B3. Designed by a registered engineer or landscape architect, depending on the project <br /> scope; the Applicant has provided a revised retaining wall design from a registered <br /> engineer which matches the submitted plans. This criterion has been met; and <br /> B4. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem. The <br /> engineer's revised analysis indicated that the Applicant's revised plan was necessary <br /> to stabilize the bluff. The wall plan has been changed/lessened from the original <br /> proposal and beneficial vegetation has been proposed to supplement new walls <br /> within the shore setback. This criterion has been met. <br /> Based on the application and the evidence submitted, the Council finds that the proposed use <br /> at the proposed location is or will be: <br /> B5. Consistent with the community management plan; the applicant has provided a <br /> landscape plan which, when matured, should offer sufficient screening of the lake <br /> access stairs and walls. This criterion is met. <br />