My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
09-09-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 2:27:25 PM
Creation date
7/9/2024 2:24:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. ■- <br />>'■ <br />r : <br />■|:- <br />i‘ . <br />I <br />«« - <br />^>; <br />Jr-'-I..- <br />"I <br />(;■ <br />r r -r. <br />► <br />i <br />E*""h' <br />!?■ <br />5i;- <br />■ , i <br />*■ . <br />^v;-‘ <br />s? <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - AUGUST 19, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1669 - CONT. <br />Callahan agreed and reiterated that Council ic trying to <br />stop what is currently going on with trading ncn-structura1 for <br />structural hardcover. <br />Kelley questioned the applicant as to when the 0-75’ <br />hardcover was Installed. <br />Mabusth noted that permits are not required tor walkways, <br />landscape, etc. and if they were required, perhaps some of this <br />Illegal hardcover installation could b’-' stopped. <br />Gaffron explained the applicant’s calculated possible <br />reduction to 27% would required major removals of the drive and <br />patio. <br />Mabusth com ented that she believed that the corner of <br />deck to be removed Is classified as structural. <br />the <br />Bellows felt that the applicant's builder must have <br />knowledge of the ordinances as he had discussions with staff. <br />had <br />Walker accepted responslbillty for the builder’s error and <br />pointed out that In 1972 the sidewalks were basically the same <br />but 0 large portion of the drive had been added. He also noted <br />that the undeveloped right-of-way Is currently a ravine and <br />property takes advantage of the natural terrain of the public <br />property. <br />Schroeder asked if there was any credence to the roof water <br />containing system. <br />Bellows noted that from her <br />underground do not work. <br />experience, downspouts <br />Walker felt that the system does work. <br />Johnson felt that the retaining walls must stay, b.^ felt <br />that the application should be tabled until an attempt is made at <br />reduction of hardcover. <br />Conen felt that the 27% hardcover should be defined better <br />In terms of what will stay and what will go. <br />Kelley asked Johnson what he would be comfortable approving. <br />Johnson felt that there were patio and driveway issues to <br />wdal with. <br />Kelley noted that the hardcover percentages will change <br />because of the "corner deck removal”. <br />Bellows felt that the patio In the 0-75’ should be removed. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.