Laserfiche WebLink
1! <br />I-h. <br />PUBLIC HEARING =‘0R PROPOSED CITY FACILITIES - AUGUST 28, 1991 <br />The pcMce department also need .■> much larger tacMit/ as it has <br />been mandated by the S^ and they need storage ro»- their <br />vehicles. The public w. oartmenfs proposed space is two- <br />thirds for storage (repi- nt cost of equipment owned is <br />$1,400,000). The machinery -leeds to be kept out of the elements <br />mainly for efficiency. There Is some room figured to the <br />proposed building for expansion room. <br />The size of the building Is sometimes met by discussions of <br />how big Plymouth Is and how our building should be the same size <br />In relation to population. That city does not closely compare <br />with Orono and they are currently in the process of expanding as <br />they do not have enough room. <br />The purpose of cities is to provide ser 'ces to the people. <br />In measuring cities, it Is important to note their ability to <br />provide services and to what degree; I.e. are they stretched to <br />the 11m t or could they do more. <br />Cities of 10,000-15,000 seem to be working efficiently and <br />economically. The cities of 2,000 or lower have the question of <br />whether they can economically survive and provide all the <br />servicii. that citizens want. The City of Orono Is between those <br />numbers. The City has contracted with other cities because we <br />have the ability to provide those services. We are not at the <br />critical mass that we use up all the people that we need, and we <br />are at the critical mass that we need all the people that we <br />have. It Is the Judgement of the Council that we cannot solve <br />the space problem by cutting staff. The City is currently <br />servicing about 91,000 feet of roads In the City, and about <br />120,000 lineal feet of sewer/water mains, In addition to parks <br />and a few other things. <br />The size of the building: <“0010 be reduced by changing the <br />shape to a square or rectangular building which would reduce the <br />cost. No aatter how small the building Is proposed at, it could <br />always be made smaller, however these are choices that the <br />Council Is not prepared to make. <br />The size of the building determines about 75-90% of the cost <br />of the project, with the next factcr the shape and external <br />materials, and type of construction materials being a much <br />smaller part of the cost. The cost is therefore determined by <br />multiplying square footage by the cost per square foot. The <br />architect has given a percentage of cost per square footage <br />figured on his experience. In February of 1991 square footage <br />needed was calculated to be approximately 29,000 s.f. for public <br />works, and 19,500 for administration and police. The furniture <br />and landscape are then added to this cost. By June of I99l the <br />square footage had been reduced for the adminlstratlve/po1 ice <br />portion to about 17.500 s.f. and the public works department <br />remained the same. The total cost was figured to be about <br />$4,414,500 and about $4.6 million without the sate of land <br />currently owned by the City. <br />4