Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />I <br />t-u ~ <br />I? <br />i>A " <br />‘■A.’ <br />n»-'iS , <br />pPA <br />f>-" ■ • <br />f .V, <br />fefe <br />^''h-E^' <br />PI- <br />tv- <br />li- <br />Ir <br />V •. <br />To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Acting Administrator Gejhardson <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning AdministS^( <br />July 16r 1991 <br />''.V♦1665 Thomas McCarthy - 1424 Baldur Park Road - <br />Variances - Referred Back to Planning Commission for <br />Further Consideration <br />Soiling District: LR-IC <br />Idst of Bxhibits <br />Exhibit A - Site Plan/Existing <br />Exhibit B - Site Plan Alternative A Excluding Overhang <br />Exhibit C - Site Plan Alternative B <br />Exhibit D - Site Plan Alternative C <br />Exhibit E - Chart of Alternatives <br />Exhibit P - Site Plan Alternative D Current Request <br />Exhibits> Addendum Submitted for Orginial Review by <br />Planning Commission <br />Description of Request: <br />At the August 12th meeting of the Council, applicant <br />prepared graphic sketches of the other options for improvements <br />discussed at Planning Commission. Review Exhibits C & D. <br />Council concurred with the majority opinion of Planning <br />Commission and advised that it was the structural Intensity of <br />the improvement that presented the problem and advised applicant <br />to revise improvment plans for additional review by Planning <br />Commission. Please note as with the second review at the <br />Planning Commission the overhang has no longer been included ^1^^ <br />the improvement project. The applicant has submitted a revised <br />plan for Planning Commission consideration. Review Exhibit F, <br />^he current plan involves construction of a new construction of <br />accessory structure and removal of former. The new garage is 24' <br />X 23* 4" . In addition to hardcover and street setback <br />variances, the proposed garage will be 4* from the west lot line, <br />i^aquiring a side setback variance for new construction. The <br />gravel area remaining will provide parking for at least one off <br />site parking stall. Please review comparison chart submitted by <br />applicant (Exhibit E), note the following structural hardcover <br />changes with each application. <br />Existing “ 344 s.f. <br />Scheme A original proposal <br />SchesMt B «■ 576 s.f. <br />Scheme C " 672 s.f. <br />Scheme D (current request) <br />» 682 s.f <br />560 s.f. <br />With the new alignment of the garage the sidewalk can now be <br />placed in a straight alignment to the access door resulting in a <br />decrease in hardcover. The tree c .n also be retained and the <br />issue of access to the building is now reduced with the open <br />corridor on the east side.