Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1366 <br />January 13, 1989 <br />Page 3 of ^ <br />staff would suggest that a stipulation be placed on the property <br />^hat no crincipal residence structures may be constructed within Outlet A, <br />and Planning Conunission may wish to consider whether accessory structures <br />should be allowed on Outlet A. <br />areas of Lerdal and Kilkenny soils over most of the area of Lot 2, both of <br />which are normally suitable for mound-type systems. Slopes on the south <br />Side of the Luce Line would generally prohibit mound systems. The site <br />evaluator has indicated that he feels that there are a number of suitable <br />sites for mound systems within the proposed Lot 2 boundaries. Testin^g <br />would certainly be required before a permit for a house would be issued. <br />However, staff is comfortable in going forward with this subdivision <br />without requiring full percolation testing. <br />Staff He ir o—sndation - <br />Staff recommends approval of the preliminary subdivision for Loren <br />Butterfield, subject to the following conditions; <br />1. A special lot combination resolution shall be filed for Lot 2 and <br />outlet A, specifying that the 2 parcels must be sold as a unit. <br />2, Likewise, a special lot combination for Lot 1 and Outlet B should <br />be required. <br />"Kv' <br />3. Outlet C shall act as a private driveway access serving Lot 2, <br />The owner of Lot 1 shall remain the owner of Outlot C as a condition <br />to Lot 2 shall be executed by the owner of Lot 1 and Outlot C. <br />■V. <br />4 Th0 driveway access where Outlot C Intersects with Watertown Road <br />be upgraded per the recoininendatlons of the City Engineer o <br />A perpendicularf flat access entrance* <br />r- <br />m 9# variance is granted for setbacks to the east line of Lot 1 <br />for the existing greenhouse buildings. The setback normally require <br />for those structures would be 10* from the side lot line. <br />I: <br />1^:; <br />; V. <br />- <br />6. Th. .pplicant Is advised that any future subdivision of 1;°* J <br />s;str.->.ritrfVr-.s*".\s;^ <br />p-oYi-cV t%“-^;nsS!!Jitr ‘.cUs^“erren-reiritl‘e*;‘%ir‘ iUTy <br />purposes. <br />I' <br />7. Septic testing will not be required for the proposed building site <br />until ^such time that a building permit is applied for, since the <br />crorertv In Question exceeds 5 total dry acres in area.