My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
08-26-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2024 12:42:20 PM
Creation date
7/8/2024 12:40:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1366 <br />March 23, 1989 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />iiiiiiiPi <br />rastrictlons imposed by the wetlands ordinance take precedence over the <br />existing activities made illegal by that ordinance* <br />be received as of this writing, however the preliminary indicatio^ns are <br />at a low level of use as in the past, would likely not be detrimental to <br />the wetland but is probably beneficial to wildlife. <br />8taf^ llei iSMeiulnt 1 iin ~ . ^ ^ •'under the assumption that the above will reflect the recommendations <br />of the City Engineer, staff would recommend the following be considered to <br />conditions of final plat approval; <br />1. Applicant shall grant a drainage easement over the northerly pcmd. <br />The easement wording will allow continued withdrawal of water from the <br />northerly pond, and will require that the pond be maintained *n its <br />present condition. <br />2. For the southerly pond, applicant shall grant a Conservation fc <br />Plowage Easement, the conditions of which will be referenced as being <br />contained in the conditional use permit for peat removal. The <br />conditional use permit shall be applied for and the approval <br />completed prior to final plat approval. (This will allow applicant <br />some flexibility in his future possibilities for use . <br />giving the City a permanent easement for protection or the weriana.^ <br />iry of issiMS to be addressed by Council: <br />A.Does Council wish to allow accessory structures south of the Luce Line <br />in either Outlets A or B? <br />B.Does Council agree with above recommendations for protection of the <br />wetlands? <br />ii
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.