Laserfiche WebLink
minutes op the ORONO council meeting op march 27, 1989 <br />ZONING PILE #1366-BUnERPIELD CONTINUED <br />Line that have accessory structures on them, ' <br />njirficular that has a house being ccr.str ,;c-ed. .lr. But^e.rieia <br />exolained that he rarely encountered pedestrians on the Luce Line <br />tlmrof day, with the exception of Fall (leaves changing <br />color) and Sundays. <br />counci Imember Netties questioned whether the cross^ing of <br />r TrAil occurrsd bv p0d0stiri3ns or V0hicl0s. • <br />B^^erffeld responderrhat ’^he^ad crossed with tractors and <br />concern, as long as an accessory structure would be allowed. <br />Councilmember Petersen asked Mr. = <br />^“'"irt’h.\° he'wfa^conc«nVd °a boVt° t h? eVnt i”nued® u'sV o f the <br />^\b"\ity to Obrain peat. He said ^ “-id be <br />happy to comply with the recommendations made by the City <br />Englnear. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed the Council <br />that base*d upon their action, he had drafted specific language <br />thit would pertain to the Engineer's recommendation. The <br />language “°V^r%%\“n^"wlttr'"r*om" o"n \°he VorlLtly <br />pMp«ty and a conservation and flowage easement <br />Imtlzlnca • conditional use permit for the wetlands on the <br />property. Mr. Butterfield would then be required to <br />apply * conditional use permit. <br />Councilmember Peterson as i whether <br />successful in obtaining the conditional in <br />lo^iT Bernhardson replied that he was directed to do that in <br />1975*and that staff was recommending that Mr. Butterfield come <br />Jorth this time with that application, since the previous <br />approval had been for temporary use only. <br />Councilmember Callahan stated that it was his opinion, the <br />division and use of this property was “"i'’;!®- /* <br />• the extremely long and narrow outlot and felt that <br />CoSld bS s future request for a lot combination of th« <br />loSth of the Luce Line. He believed that the recommendation of <br />the Planning Commission ought to be followe . <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaff ron * <br />•Specl.l tot CP-f V outloi* A 'to *em^i*n together. <br />it JouTd not preven?^ recpiest for reroning. <br />5?Ii fiat believe that would be a permanent solution to a possible <br />cilllhln r.Twr.ted his desire to follow the Planning <br />CoMieeion's recommendation to allow no accessory structures <br />south of the Luce Line. <br />Jy.