Laserfiche WebLink
I nc: fit.ijULMrt \jnuiHU uuuiNUiu Mtcix.iva - muuuo i !«.± j. <br />(#16) lONINQ FILE #i'83 - THOMAS MCCARTHY - cont. <br />Butlar felt that ‘he CouncM 1s not there to help In design <br />and It should be brought bacK to the Planning Commission, She <br />a iso <br />brou^.. <br />proposa <br />. project is too ambitious for the lot. <br />explained that the second time the proposal <br />the Planning Commission, applicant amended <br />exclude overhang over the waU.way. <br />was <br />the <br />Goetton felt that the applicant should look at tro whole lot <br />and see wfiere other removals or changes In hardcover percentages <br />can be made and also the gazeoo should maybe be considered for <br />remova1. <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to refer <br />Application #1665 back to the Planning Commission with the <br />recommendation to the applicant that he work with staff to revise <br />his request. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#11) ZONING FILE #1397 - ART CENT-IR OF MINNESOTA <br />2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE <br />CLARIFICATION OF IMPROVEMENTS <br />Marty Schneider was present to represent the Art Center. <br />Gerhardson provided a brief explanation of the request; <br />noting that they are seeking clarification of the conditions of <br />the subdivision approval. <br />Mabusth described the request of the Art Center and <br />explained conditions of the subdivision in 1989. She noted that <br />these were specific areas of concern and noted the loading area <br />to east side of building is also being used for parking. There <br />Is also a gravel access drive and parking area which are not <br />shown on the original plans for the residential lot. There is a <br />need to provide applicant with further direction on these areas. <br />Schneider explained the subdivision was conditional on threo <br />conditions: l) parking; 2) screening/fenc1ng along north <br />property line; 3) readjustment of exterior lighting from Kill <br />School parcel. A $5,000 cashiers check was given tc the City to <br />ensure Improvements would be done. Schneider *elt that he has <br />fulfilled all conditions of that developer’s agreement and wants <br />the City to release the cashiers check. He opposed the City <br />holding the check for other issues outstanding with the Art <br />Center. Schneider noted that the City feels the fencing Is <br />temporary, however the code does not specify materials to be used <br />for fencing. The City has required the access to be closed off, <br />end It has. Schneider explained that thw City Is now requiring <br />"appropriate" landscaping whore the former parking area on nis <br />property was. He explained that he plans to bul'd a garage there <br />and wishes to retain the gravel until that time.