Laserfiche WebLink
rr:Zoning File #1604 <br />June 13, 1991 <br />Page 2 <br />Staff Re ndatlon <br />If Planning Commission determines that there will be no <br />adverse impac on the natural envirc.iment qualities of this <br />wetland area, a project approval recommendation would be <br />appropriate on .he basis that all storm water and flood plain <br />management engineering requirements have been met so that there <br />is no adverse Impact on the quantity or quality of run-off <br />leaving this site. A further basis for approval would be that <br />the area will be restored and maintained as a natural habitat <br />rather than a "park-like" setting. Do the proposed retaining <br />walls have any effect on the visual perception of 'naturalness <br />of this pond? Certainly the walls decrease the spoils bank <br />slopes, reducing the potential for erosion back into the pond. <br />Any recommendation for approval should be conditioned on the <br />following: <br />1.Applicant shall conform to all construction -»nd site <br />•rotection requirements recommended by the City <br />ngineer and required by the Watershed District.I <br />2.gilt fencing shall be maintained in place during the <br />period of excavation and until revegetation is <br />accomplished . <br />3.Applicant shall adhere to the revegetation plan as <br />proposed . <br />4.Applicant shall grant a Flowage and Conservation <br />easement over the entire wetland area defined by <br />elevation contour 931.5, plus a 15' easement extending <br />to the 8" PVC culvert at Navarre Lane. The legal <br />description for such easement shall be provided by the <br />applicant's surveyor. <br />The Planning Commission is further requested to either <br />or revise your recommendation regarding the allowable <br />height of boundary pillars. <br />lav