My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-22-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
07-22-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2024 10:57:49 AM
Creation date
7/1/2024 10:53:54 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'V <br />5. Mlaiaiic the polluUiDts reaching Lake Minnetonka and its tributaries viu septic tank <br />leachate aad residues from past treatment practices. [Comment: see polic} S, p.ll] <br />tha individua l oitws shall ina iudo the <br />re»}t»>a >naaf of Minaa sota Ruiest Cha ptae 70 80, con< <br />ipaatBiaat sta ada fidii Thai# standa rds-a fa-u oas ista nt with tha sawa ga <br />iha naw Shorala nd Ma noga ma ni Ra gwiat ions of tha DNR <br />imant Stand a rds a a d Crita ria a oa taw ta d in-Appa ndut C. <br />[ComaMati at tUac this was fonaulatcd and adopted, it was appropriate, but is no longer timely; <br />reference to Appendix C did not meet with approval of cities] <br />6.Protect receiving water quality from the detrimental effects of serious erosion, either during <br />or after coastniction of residential and commercial developments, and to ensure that runoff <br />from the developed site is of good quality. [Comment: see policy 9. p. 12) <br />Erosion and sedimentation control plans, meeting the criteria established <br />by the Board of Water and Soil Resources.-shatt be roquira d on a ll <br />dauel opmaati in tha watawhadi The lakeshoru eommunitiot sba ll ruguire <br />tha t ttoea nua ter runtdT be mana ged acc ordia g to ma nagem um objua tivu <br />tha asaai (Coawcat: fornu basis for paragraph following policy 9 on p.l2: discussion following <br />policy $ oa page 10 caconrages dtics to require...; focus should be on performance standards <br />ratliwthna prescriptive standards as the above text suggests. A performance standards might say. <br />for example, that mnoff from any parcel should not exceed the runoff generated by the parcel <br />before demfopamat) <br />ilfoili and to <br />[Cumnmat: basis for policy 3, pp.t aad 9] <br />Tlta UdCP ah al l eantiaua to work eooperat ivi <br />^ # V?___• * #1^ o| • t <br />3 aad the foUowlag diacasaioa, pp.O aad 9] <br />>of<i>o mana gemoni jgencww» tocooir<4 <br />la a iia wa odsi [Comment: basis for policy <br />oa t -Woflit pfodua as its fimt <br />[Comment: see previoas comments about footnotes] <br />Miaimiae the a dvtrae water qaality Impacts of dredging activities on the quality of public <br />waters. (Cemmeat: eee policy 5, p.9] <br />[Comment: my initial reaction was that saying the LMCD endorses <br />Rale C has mnr|teal valae la the plaa; LMCD eaactiag Ms own wetland ordinance might better fit <br />hi the wtdaad paHcfos, perhaps nadcr policy It oo p. 13.~this needs nMirc dlscu.'.>ioa] <br />The LMCD, skmg with the DNR Division of Waters snd the Minnehaha Creek <br />Wstenhed District, sre drafting sn interagency policy resolution to <br />EP-10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.