Laserfiche WebLink
urxte ve top ed lawfe rtiH zon ed-at -6.000-square fe«it lot ur»a<i.- By alkwing fiewihility <o 4k><jr*«o Mi loi <br />sige by up 4o 40 percem (6Q percent of the sinndard). thefie-smaller lo(t ^ fait tnto comp liance. <br />[comment: dropped at request of cities; no longer applicable] <br />Thifr-tfade off is allo wed under the DNR regulation s when or eas fatting below the DNR -mmimum <br />ataiidardg are off set by areas that are mor e restrictive . The Management Plan effere the opportun ity <br />for on e community on the lake to be dev elop ed at smaller tot stges qs tong ns anoth er community has <br />mor e ■rastrictiv e standardsi—Thus, (he agreements reached do not ervoourag e smaller lots, but the <br />agreements do allow them to continu e to be used swithin a reore- restricted regulatory framework , <br />^comment: dropped at request of cities; no longer applicable] <br />To prot ect cities that are mor e festrictive . ■ the Standards and Cfiierta Include statements that <br />eneo uroge cities to be eve n mor e restrictiv e.—le order >o aoh leve (he through the <br />subeommitte e deliberatkinc. it if. imperniiwe that som e munk-tpaii;ief' remiiin m<He ref.trictive <br />[comment: dropped at request or cities: no longer applicable] <br />Recreational use of the lake creates addition al concern s fe)r stHH-etaod pfote c-tlon. Such uoc crcatot . <br />pressures for on shor e devel opm ents within shor elands. BuM'ne»t«io «. and certain residential usoc are <br />attracted to the shor eline both because of the quaiiiy of the tal»e‘s resourc e and because of the targe <br />booting populat ion on ftummer wo okonda. [comment: not nee<led or relevant to the combined <br />chapter] <br />Jf Lake Minnetcmka is to serve expanded regional demand for water-oriented recreation, the best place <br />to do so is on its shoreline. During peak use hours there is an average of one boat for every 8 acres of <br />usable water on a summer weekend day. However, the busiest day recorded on the lake had 2256 active <br />boats during peak hours which is one lx)at for every 6.2 acres of water. That is significantly greater than <br />the other regional water resources in the metropolitan area; the Lower St. Croix River has an average <br />>f IS acres of water per boat, [comment: may be included in recreation chapter] <br />// is logical, then, to examine increased use of its shoreline to meet the expanding regional demand for <br />water-oriented recreation. Regional opportunities for picnicking and swimming are presently limited on <br />the take. Development of the lake shore is largely limited to neighborhood parks and the Excelsior <br />Commons. Picnicking and swimming opportunities have been developed largely to sen>e resident <br />neighborhoods. Only the Excelsior Commons has the capacity' to serve a significant regional population. <br />[comment: may be included in recreation chapter] <br />^RM SHORELANP PROTECTIOM <br />facts aesthetics, bo th from the shor e and from the <br />tio -heahht safetyt and general welfare by <br />aontn ’buting t( <br />affects the natural ewwronm ent of the -lefce and commun ity and impairs the loca l tan base.—In <br />furtherance of the pol icies declared in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 105, 115, 116. ?»1. 3sS and '162. <br />and Minnesota Rulest section s 6130t3600 to-6l3 0i3900t minimum standards and ofu eria are <br />established for the subdivi sio nt use and deMelopm ent of the bhor elands of Lake Minnetonka. The <br />standards and criteria are intended to preserv e and enhance the quality of surface waters; preserv e <br />and enhance aesthetics for shore land residents and users of the water surface; con serv e the econom ic <br />and natural environm ental-ualues of shor elands; and provide -for the wise use of water and related