Laserfiche WebLink
>- <br />rr <br />■K' <br />■IV'"k <br />• ^ ‘ ■.•S' <br />i.'j' <br />I <br />I <br />K' <br />I <br />(P <br />l; <br />ii.( <br />?:■ <br />r <br />y^tc-v <br />/hrAOMevr / <br />OOTLIMB - ISSDBS/OPTIONS - SBORBLAND CLASSIFICATIONS <br />AND LAND USB DISTRICTS <br />Section 4.1 <br />1. Does the City agree with the DNR's proposed designations of <br />various lakes as General Development, Recreational Development or <br />Natural Environment? Which lakes, if any, should be designated <br />differently than the DNR proposal? <br />2. Are there any lakes proposed to be designated as shore land areas <br />that the City doew not want to designate at all? <br />3* Are there basins not listed by the DNR that the City wishes to <br />protect by designating as GD/RD/NE? <br />4. Does the City agree with the DNR's designation of Painters Creek, <br />Long Lake Creek, and the creek from Wolsfeld/Holy Name Lakes into Long <br />Lake, as tributary streams subject to shoreland regulations? <br />5. Nhlch additional tributary streams, if any, does the City wish to <br />place Into a "protected tributary" classification? <br />6. What are the ramifications and impacts on existing and future <br />development of classifying or not classifying each lake or tributary <br />as a protected shoreland area? <br />Section 4.2 ~ Land Use District Descriptions <br />1, Are Orono's existing land use zoning districts consistent with <br />minimum DNR standards? If not, what changes are appropriate to <br />provide such consistency? <br />2* Are there specific uses within shoreland areas that the City <br />wishes to restrict to non-shoreland areas by stating so in a general <br />shoreland overlay district synopsis? <br />Section 5.1 <br />1. While Orono's zoning districts in nearly all respects meet the <br />minimum standards for lot area and width on NE/RD/GD lakes, our <br />current Code does not require excess lot area or width for a duplex on <br />0 riparian lot in a sewered zone adjacent to and constructed within <br />200* of a coBunercia 1/industria 1 zone. Should the City increase the <br />performance standards required for the duplex credit to be consistent <br />with DNR standards? <br />2. (Section 5.13) Will the tributary sewered/unsewered lot width <br />standards be a problem for any location in Orono which abutts a <br />proposed tributary?