Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1(T04-ROOD CONTINUED <br />four feet." <br />Bellows suggested that it m <br />to entirely forego the pillars. <br />in Mr. Ro s bes -res <br />Mr. Rood asked whether he .oui. apply for a Var^anoe tc have <br />the pillars five feet high. <br />Kelley infor.Tied Mr. Rood tlai .he 'ad t.he rignt to s^ubrr.it a <br />Variance application if he w.ir-ed dc so. He said, ’’However <br />the Plan.ling Cormnission h-..L -er fairly consistent in <br />recommending that fences alot'. purl-- road-iys be no mere than <br />..5 feet high." <br />#1605 DR. RICHARD LINDSTROM <br />1065 WEST FERNDALE ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />CONTINOATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />Charles Lindstrom, the applicant's brother, and Paul Becker, <br />the applicant's contractor, were present. Cohen stated >_hat due <br />to his professional relationship with Charles Li.ndstro.m, he would <br />abstain from the discussion and voting on this matter. <br />Kelley opened the Public Hearing at 8:45 pm. <br />Gaffron distributed a <br />heights and floor elevations, <br />most part, have revised their <br />0-75' setbac/v area. Tlie only <br />the existing house. Cha i 'es <br />setback area. There must oe a <br />line and I am concerned about <br />in relation to the flood plain <br />«^ketch showing the revised roc”’ <br />He said, "The applicants, for the <br />plan to keep hardcover out of the <br />encroachment in t.hat area is above <br />aie still proposed for the 75-250' <br />30* pool setback from the side lot <br />the elevation of the be nt floor <br />Mr. B.edker referred the Planning Commission ro the sketch <br />____^ mm, ^ ^ Mthat Gaffron had distributed.He said, "You car. see that the <br />existing basement is below tie flood plain elevation. We propose <br />to construct the first level of the garage at t.ie 9 32.6 <br />elevation. The second level of garage would be at 939.11, whicn <br />is approximately two f-: .' above the existing m-.^ in floor. 'The <br />second floor addition •/ould ever, out across t.he garage addition <br />the existing s ’uc’.ure.We are prcoosing to construct a <br />t :k planter, approximately 40’ long and 2' high, outside the <br />matn entrance to accommodate the 2' difference in tne garage <br />elevation. The driveway will slope up that additional two feet <br />along the pla..ter up to tne garage." <br />Bellows as’ced Mr. Bedker wnat t.he slope is <br />lower garage. <br />:oning out of the <br />Mr. Bedker replied, "We are proposing a 5% slope. <br />10 <br />zo