My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 10:32:41 AM
Creation date
6/25/2024 10:24:37 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I ' <br />I <br />!fr. <br />f;. <br />!•;. <br />ff <br />*Cr <br />^y- . <br />f <br />i-r"v <br />„e <br />V«‘-'ri-jji. <br />1^' <br />%' <br />f <br />b <br />|: <br />I <br />t <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 17, 1991 <br />(#2)ZONING FILE #1604-CLAIR ROOD <br />2215 KENNOOD WAY <br />CONDITIONAL OSE PERMIT/VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />Kelley noted that Clair Rood was present, and continued the <br />Public Hearing on this matter at 8:20 p.m. <br />Gaffron advised the Planning Commission that Mr. Rood had <br />submitted the additional information requested by the Planning <br />Commission at their May 20, 1991 meeting.He stated that the <br />revised plans show the pillars and retaining walls, but do not <br />show that pillars are also located on Mr. Rood's property <br />adjacent to Navarre Lane. <br />Mr. Rood indicated that he would prefer to have the pillars <br />at a height of 4*} feet, rather than 3^ feet as required by the <br />City. He intends to plant shrubbery in between the pillars that <br />would be maintained at a height of four feet.He noted that <br />there were several fences in his neighborhood that were six feet <br />in height. <br />Bellows stated that the elevations of the pillars and hedges <br />shown on the plan do not depict the plans explained by Mr. Rood, <br />nor does it show what actually exists on Mr. Rood's property. <br />She said/ "The plan shows the hedges above the pillars. Mr. Rood <br />has indicated that he wants the hedge 1/2 foot below the pillars. <br />The plan shows that pillars are located along one property line <br />when in fact there are pillars along two property lines. I am <br />becoming concerned about this because each time a plan has been <br />submitted, it does not show what presently exists on the <br />property. We gave Mr. Rood very explicit direction as to what we <br />wanted to see. We also indicated that v/e wanted the property to <br />remain in as natural a state as possible. I am not sure that is <br />occurring." <br />Rood explained that he is requesting approval to construct <br />the pillars 4*s feet, which is the height of the existing pillars. <br />He stated that if the Planning Commission will not allow the <br />pillars at a 4*j foot height, he would have to reduce the height <br />to 3^ feet. <br />Kelley stated that Mr. Rood is seeking approval of a <br />Conditional Use Permit and Variance for excavation and creation <br />of a pond within a wetland area. <br />Gaffron confirmed <br />Mabusth asked if <br />for the pillars/fence. <br />»y's statement. <br />3d is now seeking a height Variance <br />Cohen stated that request is not included in the application <br />being reviewed in this Public Hearing. <br />-3 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.