My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
07-08-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2024 10:32:41 AM
Creation date
6/25/2024 10:24:37 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORQNQ <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO.3:9 <br />‘A <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A RENEWAL VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZOMING CODE <br />SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) <br />PILE #1540 <br />WHEREAS, Ronald and Julie Prineas (hereinafter <br />applicants") are the owners of the property located at 1920 <br />Shoreline Drive within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and <br />legally described as follows: <br />Per Exhibit "A", attached (hereinafter "the property"); <br />and <br />WHEREAS, the applicants have applied to he City for a <br />renewal of variances granted in 1989 per Resolution #2650 to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to permit <br />the construction of a single family residence on a lot of defined <br />width 30' where a -defined lot width of 200' is normally required. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br />Orono, Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1540. <br />2. The property is located in the LR~1A Single Family <br />Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br />3.The Orono Planning Commission originally reviewed this <br />application #1410 on May 15, 1989, and recommended approval <br />of the proposed variance based upon the following findings; <br />A)The lot area exceeds the minimum 2.0 dry buildable <br />acre requirement. <br />B)A feasible building envelope exists in addition to <br />pj^iin^ry and alternate drainfield sites which have been <br />tested and approved for use. <br />C)The hardship to the property lies in its extreme <br />narrowness at the point where the defined lot width is <br />measured. Furthermore, there is no adjacent land <br />available for purchase that would increase the defined <br />lot width to the 200' minimum standard. <br />Page 1 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.