Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />I: <br />k: <br />P'Iv: <br />i:.0. <br />I: <br />l^v <br />k- <br />... <br />^V - <br />*;j. <br />I V. <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />OATS: <br />Mayor and City Council <br />lark E. Bernhardson, City Administrator^^ >\ <br />> <br />\J <br />September 14, 1990 <br />SOBJECT: Stubbs Bay Proposed Sewer Project <br />Attachment: A. Stubbs Bay Sev/er Memo Dated 8/6/90 <br />B. Response Maps <br />ISSUE - <br />1. Present to Council information regarding the response to date <br />of parties interested in having the project undertaken. <br />2. Determine a course of action at this stage : the project. <br />INTRODUCTION - As of September 15, 1990, which was the <br />■unofficial'"’’cut off point for returns (45 days after they were <br />transmitted on July 31, 1990) the staff had received the <br />followIng : <br />The.V desiring sewer - <br />Those objecting to the sewer - 31 <br />No return received - 58 <br />101 <br />In addition to those in the main part of the project <br />following responses were received in optional areas. <br />the <br />Oxford Road - 3 of 3 objecting <br />South of Bayside - 4 of 6 objecting <br />> 2 no response <br />W: - <br />H’' ■ <br />is <br />■ <br />At this point it would appear that the 70% level of interest will <br />not be achieved. Interested private parties have indicated a <br />desire to campaign door to door given this lack of results. <br />Attaehaeat B illustrates those who expressed an interest both for <br />and against. It is interesting to note that persons even on a <br />holding tank have indicated they have no interest in a sewer <br />project. <br />ACTION ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Accept the information <br />ife; <br />♦ _ <br />.YV , <br />/