My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2024 11:14:59 AM
Creation date
6/24/2024 11:04:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
607
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Wr-' <br />% <br />'l-.V, <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1991 <br />(#14)HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR CONTINUED <br />upgrade beyond a four-lane highway. I would think at a minimum <br />that the City should be in favor of deleting Highv/ay 55. and <br />County Road 11, and possibly County Road 6 and the south bypass <br />based on an inability for those routes to meet traffic <br />objectives. However the arguments supporting the deletion of <br />County Road 6 and the south bypass may not be shared by the <br />other communities.” <br />Sherokee Use asked Council if they were going to take the <br />position for deleting corridors suggested by the City <br />Administrator. She indicated that the Citizens Group had met <br />with the Long Lake Residents Group. She said, "At the meeting we <br />put together three pages of items to which there was mutual <br />agreement, and three pages of items to which the City of Long <br />Lake disagreed. One of the items in which the City of Long Lake <br />is interested is the idea of shared transportation burden. This <br />me. ,.s that County Road 6, Highway 12, and Highway 55 would be <br />upgraded and designated to address various aspects of traffic. <br />It seems that may be one of the main issues that the two groups <br />could agree to, but if we delete Highway 55, that would not be <br />possible. We agreed at the meeting that we would encourage MNDOT <br />to take a serious look at the possibility of upgrading both <br />Highway 55 and Highv/ay 12. I would urge the Council to think <br />hard about Highway 55 to see if we cannot convince MNDOT to look <br />at that option first." <br />Bernhardson stated that upgrading Highway 55 would not pull <br />enough traffic off of Highway 12. The projections are still^at <br />25f000. There are traffic problems with the current traffic <br />level on Highway 12, which is 18,000. Bernhardson commented <br />further that if MNDOT spends money to make a link in Delano <br />between Highway 12 and Highway 55 that they would be reluctant to <br />spend additional funds to do any additional upgrades to Highway <br />12. <br />Mayor Peterson indicated that she had met with Larry Dallam <br />and his comments echoed those just made by Bernhardson. Highv/ay <br />55 is too far north to pull traffic off of Highway 12, and for <br />that reason. Highway 55 is not a viable route. <br />Use stated that she is leery of using MNDOT's rationale and <br />that there are still many questions to be answered about traffic <br />levels on Highway 12. <br />Goetten stated that it may not be wise for the City to take <br />a position on deleting any routes other than the south bypass if <br />ig to have successful negotiations with the City of Long Lake. <br />Sbe said, "It is true we have been getting some negative feedback <br />about the shared transportation burden option, but perhaps that <br />will be the final resolution. Even though it may be true that <br />Highway 55 will not take enough traffic from Highway 12, there <br />- 10 - <br />■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.