My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2024 11:14:59 AM
Creation date
6/24/2024 11:04:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
607
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'V- <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1991 <br />(|12)OPTIONAL SALES TAX CONTINUED , nooi ^ <br />throughout the County have until August 1* 19yi» o <br />reverse that action. He said. "If the communities representing a <br />maiority of the population within the County adopt resolutions <br />that go against whatever action is taken by the County Board, <br />then the communities will prevail effective August 1, 1991, and <br />the tax would be removed effective January 1, 1992. As it stands <br />now, the sales tax will be raised 1/2 percent on July 1, 1991. <br />If the County and/or cities support resolutions opposing the 1/2 <br />percent sales tax, the tax would be removed December 31. 1991. <br />If such is the case, the various cities and County will lose <br />whatever aid there is." <br />Butler stated that in reality the sales tax is not optional. <br />Goetten agreed and expressed disappointment in the State <br />Legislature for passing this issue to the municipal level as <br />opposed to handling it themselves on the State level. <br />Callahan asked Bernhardson what the City of Orono <br />currently receiving for State Aid. <br />Bernhardson replied, "Right now, the City of Orono does not <br />receive any Local Aid or Homestead Credit in 1991. Part of this <br />package is a buydown in the classification rate from 3% to 2*s% <br />in :992, and 2% in 1993. In 1992, the City would receive an <br />estira,?ted $91,000 which would be used to purchase that buy-dov/n. <br />If thac money is not distributed in Hennepin County# instead of <br />receiving that $91,000 to buy-down 1/2 a percent, that amount <br />would be spread over the rest of the Orono City tax base. This <br />means that anyone with taxes under 3% would increase. In 1993, <br />under what is now the vetoed distribution formula, the City was <br />supposed ^ receive approximately $240,000, which is to buy-down <br />from 2%% CO 2%. It will make a significant difference if that <br />distribution formula is used." <br />Jabbour stated that it seems the State Legislature has no <br />concern about the number of Minnesotans who are spending their <br />money outside the State to avoil sales tax. There is a major <br />loophole in the system. <br />Butler asked Bernhardson for his recommendation regarding <br />Council's action relative to the draft resolution. <br />Bernhardson replied, "The Council may chose to take no stand <br />at this point. I base that statement on information I have <br />received indicating that the communities representing a majority <br />Qf County population have already adopted resolutions <br />supporting the implementation of the 1/2 percent sales tax. <br />Based on that, the County will more than likely approve the local <br />option sales tax." <br />- 6 - <br />•>33
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.