My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2024 11:14:59 AM
Creation date
6/24/2024 11:04:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
607
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I- <br />I <br />•' -t •: <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 28. 1991 <br />(#15)POLICE CHIEF SELECTION CONTINUED <br />It v;as moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Butler, to adopt <br />the position description prepared by James Brimeycr. of Sathe ft <br />Associates, and direct the consultant to include reprasentatj.ves <br />from each of the cities and screen dov/n to the final candidates <br />based on preliminary intervie\/s and that the contract cities use <br />that representative as a non-voting member in the final intcrv..ev/ <br />process. Council appoints Lt. Cheswi.ck as Acting Chief for the <br />period from July 1, 1991. until a person has begun as the new <br />police chief. Butler asked if there would be a change in Lt. <br />Cheswick*s pay scale after July 1st. Bernnardson indicated that <br />has not yet been considered or discussed. Butler stated that a <br />decision whether there is a pay increase could bo based on the <br />amount of time Lt. Cheswick will be asked to serve in the <br />capacity of Acting Chief. All voted aye. Motion passed. <br />(#16)HlGRHAy 12 CORRIDOR STUDY <br />Mayor Peterson thanked Ann <br />Carlson for their efforts. <br />and Dodd Cosgrova and Bruce <br />Bernhardson presented Council with the traffic study <br />information from Howard, Needles, and Associates, that had been <br />pj^Qvided to the Policy, Technical, and Citizens Conutii ttecs. <br />Bernhardson stated that the purpose of the next round of <br />Committee meetings will be to more closely examine the traffic <br />forecast numbers to see if they make sense, and to determine if <br />any of the routes will not meet the anticipated need. He said. <br />"The forecasts do not really indicate what the best route is. <br />Goetten stated that after the last meeting she attended, it <br />seemed that MNDOT was looking more seriously at the south bypass. <br />She said, "I v/as trying to make the MNDOT representatives <br />understand that such an alternative should be the least imoortant <br />route for them to consider. MNDOT's thinking is that traffic now <br />using County Road 15 would use the south bypass. As I understand <br />it, the reason fIcCulley Road v/as upgraded was to allow traffic to <br />go from Mound up to Highway 12. bypassing County Road 15. That, <br />, is not the case, because of the congestion on Highway <br />12. I think the Council needs to prepare a statement specifying <br />fsasons why the south bypass should be eliminated from the <br />alternatives." <br />Butler suggested that it would be helpful for the citizens <br />that have been involved in this process, to contact State <br />Legislators and stress their viewpoints on this issue. She said. <br />"The State Legislators need to be reminded that any new highway <br />corridor will be extremely expensive to construct. The taxpayers <br />of Minnesota will not be receptive to the idea of paying for yet <br />another stretch of blacktop. It is my understanding that the <br />State of Minnesota has more miles of blacktop per capita- than <br />alflK>st any other state in the Country. Minnesota is not the most <br />heavily populated State in the Country, and we have a climate <br />- 13 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.