My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
06-24-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2024 11:14:59 AM
Creation date
6/24/2024 11:04:45 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
607
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
k- <br />8. <br />I <br />'S- <br />■•; ■ <br />9. <br />K- <br />tet\- <br />. -I ' <br />r'^-* <br />'f-'' <br />that individual properties were looking for additional <br />hookups that would help decrease the overall unit charge but <br />that orooerty would then have to pay tor nore units. <br />Will a new subdivision, such as the one being proposed east <br />of Leaf Street, be included in the project? <br />It has not been the policy or the City to include any areas <br />that do not absolutely need sewer. This area is developing <br />to a 2 acre standard and preliminary indications are that iw <br />t]2ve aaecuate conditions for on—site septic systems on <br />each building site. Even if the City were to allow seweri.ng <br />of this area, the topography of the area would^racuire <br />significant design parameters that would nor result in a <br />substantial reduction in unit lateral cost foe the Stubbs Bay <br />project. Inclusion of all those units in the project may <br />reduce the trunk cost by about 29%. (100 units in Stubos Bay <br />22, units in "Sussa-x") <br />Why is the property on Oxford Road being left out? <br />Again, this area was developed to the 2 acre standard and <br />although it is lakeshore property which differentiates it <br />from the property east of Leaf, it is not contemplated to be <br />included as there should be adequate septic systems for this <br />area. Based on general City policy we have not addressed <br />this question to the Council but we will address both t.nis <br />and the question regarding the subdivision. The inclusion of <br />the Oxford property would probably reduce the trunk cost by <br />about 10*. (10 properties) <br />• How soon could a project be undertaken? <br />The project progress is dependent on the level of interest of <br />the neighborhood. If substantial interest is generated this <br />fall and hearings could be held this winter, plans could be <br />drawn this winter and construction begun in the spring. It <br />is important to realize that the Council will probably not <br />undertake this project unless a substantial majority of the <br />property owners are interested in undertaking this project to <br />the point of agreeing to sign a waiver of appeal on this <br />project. . This is a neighborhood problem, and the <br />neighborhood should get together to decide how they want to <br />solve it. (It was mentioned that the current prices are as
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.