Laserfiche WebLink
1^' <br />&t <br />f. ■- <br />V <br />• *r <br />Issue #2 “ <br />Tjn-*.ral Subdistricts - While this may bring down the average cost <br />srii^cted pro^e Tties it would be appropriate that additional <br />study be undertaken. <br />B. East of Lear Jtreet <br />"T. Include <br />2. Exlude <br />C. Blanche Property <br />1. Exclude <br />2. Extend the service chif^e the3. Serve with long private service which shifts the <br />burden from the project to the owner. <br />\CTION ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Adopt recommendations <br />2. Amend and adopt. <br />3, Table for further discussion. <br />4. Take no action. <br />RECO’ iNDATION “ It is recommended that the Co”ncil include in <br />^ of those properties that do nc have a full 2 <br />ore. ?htr.U in tie proximity of the project and that would <br />iSIlude the 5 parcels east of Leaf Street together with Mr. <br />Blanche's property and all 2 acre properties abutting the main. <br />Tn it is recoiiiinsnded that a latter be sent to thos . on <br />55ford Road to dJ* ermine because cf their proximity to the lake <br />?f thty h.»r.n in«rest i: being included in the project, <br />advising thee of the general cost estimate for inclusion. <br />It is recommended that propert. es south of the <br />It jr?ec"»lnded that p-operties on Christine Drive ^ <br />- - -- - iect. It is r'*commended that any study <br />2 acres which does not abutt a trunk line <br />t and proven alternate sites available and <br />, be excluded at the request of the property <br />excluded from the <br />property in excesf <br />and which has te <br />formally preserve <br />owner. <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by _r seconded by ^5® Bavside <br />-•ir Hd *Sd € ^ <br />.Pm