My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2024
>
06-17-2024 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2024 9:48:31 AM
Creation date
6/18/2024 11:24:34 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Katie Fitzsimmons
Created:
6/18/2024 11:29 AM
Modified:
6/18/2024 11:29 AM
Text:
PC Exhibit A
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
712
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 03/20/2024 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 06/10/2024 <br />60-Day Review Period Extension Expires: 08/09/2024 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Chair Bollis and Planning Commission Members <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br /> <br />From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc <br /> <br />Date: 17 June 2024 <br /> <br />Subject: #LA24-000018, Matt Jasper, 4745 North Shore Drive <br /> <br />Conditional Use Permit: retaining walls within the 75-foot setback/bluff <br />Variances: Average Lakeshore Setback, 75-foot Lake Setback, Hardcover w/in 75-foot setback <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />The applicant, Matt Jasper, is the new owner of the property. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District issued <br />Permit 24-056 for shoreline stabilization including rip-rap (attached as Exhibit K). Additionally, Mr. Jasper <br />proposes to install a new, stone lake access stair with retaining wall-supported landings, a new lakeside shed, and <br />a retaining wall upslope from the new rip-rap on the eastern portion of the shoreline. The shed requires average <br />lakeshore and 75-foot OHWL setback variances, and a hardcover variance within the 75-foot setback; the retaining <br />walls require conditional use permit approval. <br /> <br />The building pad area for the lake shed and the applicant’s measurements of the previously existing metal shed do <br />not align with the city’s survey records, nor was there a permit for a shed with the noted dimensions in the <br />property file. If the removed metal shed was placed on the lakeshore without permits, it would not be a legally <br />nonconforming building with the rights and protections afforded to legal non-conformities. The applicant’s <br />current shed design appears to be an attempt to recapture an illegal nonconforming building as there does not <br />appear to be conclusive evidence to legitimize the metal shed. Therefore, the proposed shed should be viewed as <br />a new improvement that is not supported by the City code or by staff. City Code Section 78-1281 allows a 20- <br />square-foot lock box with a maximum height of 48 inches within the shore setback zone. <br /> <br />According to the submitted survey, the proposed shed will be 2.88 feet from the OHWL; alternately, the Hagen <br />wall site plan shows the shed proposed at 3.4 feet from the OHWL. The inconsistencies throughout the submitted <br />information should be resolved before the application is reviewed by the City Council. <br /> <br />In bluff and steep slope settings, the code allows stairways, lifts, and landings either constructed above the ground <br />on posts or pilings or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures <br />control of soil erosion. The applicant should provide supporting evidence that the proposed stone staircase is <br />preferential to the post stair system. <br /> <br />Application Summary: The applicant requests a conditional use permit and variances to construct new retaining <br />walls, lake access stairs supported by walls, and a new 14.5’x 11.3’ lakeside shed placed less than 5 feet from the <br />OHWL within the average lakeshore setback, 75-foot lake setback, bluff area, and restricted hardcover area. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial of the variances for the shed as <br />proposed, denial of the set-in-grade stone staircase with walls in the bluff, and staff further recommends tabling <br />the application to allow the applicant to provide the additional information requested. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.