Laserfiche WebLink
fe <br />> <br />r* *‘w: <br />■V <br />‘i' <br />!'■ <br />k^'*. <br />?v <br />I <br />r.‘ H <br />r. <br />!. <br />?kv <br />fv^=" <br />j:i:K <br />Ki’ - /•' <br />c:.. <br />rot Mayor Peterson and C5.ty Council <br />Datat 4^ <br />Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building i Zoning Administrator 4u <br />June S 1991 ^ <br />Si^iacti #1600 Rick's Super Valu, 3333 Shoreline Drive - ^ <br />Review of Amended Commercial Site Plan <br />List of bhlbits ' <br />A - Approved Site Plan <br />B “ Proposed Grading Plan <br />C - West Elevation <br />D - Site Plan - Sketch <br />On February 11# 1991# Council approved a 10* setback (to <br />side street yard of Kelly Avenue) variance for a proposed <br />addition to Rick's Super Valu. The 10' setback variance was <br />required for a structural addition consisting of a 47 xl25 <br />addition and a 28'xl2' receiving dock. The remaining structure <br />at the 10' setback would be the retaining wall running 113 and <br />at a maximum height of 17*. Applicant's original landscaping <br />plans included extensive plantings •lo^^ 'the portions of the <br />retaining wall in excess of 4-5' in height (review Exhibit A). <br />The applicant has proposed an eunendment that would involve <br />approval of the City to grade within the unused portion of right- <br />of-way for Kelly Avenue creating a gentler ®1°P® <br />that looks like a retaining wall is actually a sketch of a <br />within the loading dock area. Grading not only is proposed <br />within the right-of-way but also within the detention wea <br />of the building. Approximately 40' of the southern detention <br />area will be filled to create gradual sloping away from <br />structure• <br />Staff would recommend approval of the request as the ability <br />to grade will minimize the impact of structure within the <br />substandard setback area. Staff has asked the consultants for <br />Rick's Super Valu to provide additional drainage information ano <br />more detail on what the impact will be on existing Avenue, <br />file City will also ask applicants to resubmit the grading plan <br />to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for review. <br />Preliminary review suggests that there will be no major <br />impact to the existing road nor to the sensitive drainage area “s <br />• result of the grading within the unused portions of the rlg».c- <br />of-waVe Drainage facilltiaa will be installed within the private <br />property portion extending to the detention pond to the south, <br />^e questions the City staff will want the *J**^®®f <br />will be# What will the impact be of the filling of 40 into the <br />detention area? . . .and How will it effect the original permit <br />approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District? <br />iMm