My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
06-10-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2024 2:20:02 PM
Creation date
6/17/2024 2:17:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I""' <br />.•'•r <br />5;- <br />•M <br />‘-.‘ 'tii' . <br />■f.O- <br />ri* •■ <br />#o <br />r ', <br />.jV- <br />k <br />■\' <br />:V^' <br />i Vi' <br />; •; • <br />^v' <br />• • <br />.J <br />City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2S48 ________ <br />3» Th« property contains a total of approximately 5+ acres <br />in area. <br />.tdeq^Ite irea linl^ to'" suppor? <br />three additional units. <br />5, The existing structure on Lot 1 <br />setbacks of the LR-IB zoning district. <br />meets all required <br />6. Lots 1 and 2 do not meet the required lot width to the <br />rear of the front yard setback line per Section r <br />Subdivision 5 (B). At the Planning Commission of July ib, <br />1990# the Planning Commission iicommended approval of the <br />lot width variances based on the following findings: <br />A) The two lots are located on a cul-de-sac. <br />B) To move the cul-de—sac further east would require <br />the removal of two sets of mature pine trees and create <br />a major impact closer to the lakeshore based on severe <br />sloping topography. <br />C) Granting a lot width variance for lots on cui-de- <br />aacs is consistent with previous City action. <br />■ON* TUMPORB BB IT RESOLVED, that based upon one or <br />■ore of the findings noted above, the city Council of the <br />variance for Lets 1 and 2, subject to the following conditions. <br />1. Pinal trading plans must specify the following <br />information t <br />A) Allowed hardcover within 75-250* and 250-500* <br />setback areas based on lot line configurations approved <br />by Council. <br />B) Basm! on Minnehaha Creek Watershe. District's final <br />construction. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />■ .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.