Laserfiche WebLink
; <br />i V, <br />S;- <br />' r <br />- I. <br />IS-fe- <br />■p^-r <br />P-fe-0-: <br />! *' <br />Bollows indicated that closing off the e.cisting cjrb cut <br />would address Mr. Graf's safety concerns, and that he could then <br />relocate his driveway to the safer point. B:*llows suggested that <br />the issue of the center island should still be reviewed given the <br />fact that other properties will be similarily affected. <br />Moos recalled that t.he ro«id configuration shown to the <br />Planning Commission during the Ps»D p,~ocess indicated cul-de-sacs <br />located in the corners of t.he property, not in the middle of the <br />roadways. <br />Graf stated that he would need at least a <br />existing drive in order to access his garage. <br />oortion of the <br />Nabusth noted that the City Engineer had confirmed that the <br />driveway wou .d ha/e to fan out to provide a turning radius to <br />access the garage. <br />Kelley asKed Mr. Graf i he would prefer to have Planning <br />Commission table his application ao he cou d co.me back with a <br />revised plan s.howing one curb cut. <br />Rowlette stated that the proposed westerly driveway will be <br />steep and that she would prefer not to have it be the sole access <br />for the property. She reiterated that she would either like to <br />see the inland removed, or a recommendation to approve two curb <br />cuts. <br />Moos stated that she would prefer one curb cut, <br />only benefit uf the island, in her opinion, is <br />curtail traffic speeds coming around the corner. <br />and <br />that <br />i.hat <br />is <br />the <br />may <br />Schroeder <br />pleasing, but <br />indicatfjd that the island <br />w-'s placed ii the wrong location. <br />aesthetically <br />Mr. Graf's <br />request stems from the inappropriate location of the island. He <br />said, "I would rather retain the island and recommend approval of <br />two curb cuts." <br />Cohen said, "The trees the inland are pretty, but <br />unfortunately, the island is creating a problem, which we never <br />intended. The Planning Commission intended to have the <br />the lots preserved, but not in the middle of the street <br />recommend one curb cut and removal of the island." <br />trees on <br />1 would <br />Johnson also preferred one curb cut, <br />needs to be further review of the island. <br />and agresd that thfire <br />Bellows and Kelley concurred with Johnson. <br />Graf indicated that removing the island would not solve the <br />sight line problem with the existing curb cut, and that he would <br />prefer not to have the second curb cut an his only driveway <br />because of the steepness and difficulty to access the garage. <br />‘ 12 - <br />ir.l:1