Laserfiche WebLink
'■ :;■ •.,• ■ <br />: : •; ^ <br />Johnson agreed wrth Rjwlette, aiding tlat i' w\11 b? <br />difficult for the neighboring properties to see the proposed <br />structure because of tie dense vegetation around tie Fern. <br />property. <br />It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Cohen, to recommend <br />that Council approve a side setbacx Variance, is well as a <br />Variance allowing an accessory structure to be nearer the front <br />or street lot line than the principal structure, based on the <br />hardships set forth in the Ferrils’ application. All voted aye. <br />Motion carried. <br />(•S)X0HIH6 FILE »1640-OROMO LIONS CLUB <br />SBCnOH OLD LOHG LAKE ROAD § HIGHWAY 12 <br />VAEIAMCB-POBLIC HEARING ^ b i c;Kelley opened the Public Hearing on this application at 8:15 <br />p.m <br />Mabusth summarized her May 13, 1991 memo outlining tiie <br />Variances required to install a "Welcome to Long Lake’ sign on <br />property within the City of Orono. She noted that staking will <br />be done by a surveyor to insure that the sign is not placed <br />within MNDOT's right-of-way. <br />be. <br />Kelley asked how far off the traveled roadway the sign must <br />road. <br />Mabusth answered that it must be at least 13 faet off of the <br />Kelley suggested that it would be best if the City of Long <br />Lake would indicate where they would like to place the sign, and <br />then come to the City of Orono for approval of that location. <br />Rowlette noted that there is a "City Limits of Long Lake" <br />sign just west of this property on which they are asking to place <br />the new sign. She questioned why the "Welcome to Long Lake" <br />could not be p?.aced in the same location as the "City Limits" <br />sign. <br />Kelley stated that the "City Limits" sign is MNDOT's and can <br />be located within the right-of-way. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Bellows, to hold this <br />Public Hearing in abeyance until such time as the location of the <br />proposed sign is indicated. Motion, Ayes—6, Johnson, Nay. <br />l4otion carried. Johnson believed that there was no need to delay <br />a recommendation as the proposed sign is fairly small and should <br />have little impact on the area. <br />(«6)X0MIIIG PILE »1641-RICBARD KEAVENY <br />3145 8B0RBLZMB DRIVE <br />COMIBRCZAL SITE PLAN REVIEW-PUBLIC HEARING <br />At 8s25 p.m., Kelley opened the Public Hearing on this <br />- 7 - <br />i <br />■