Laserfiche WebLink
I' <br />r'' <br />'tk- <br />f ‘ <br />''.V*: ■ ■ <br />■ ^ ' <br />'• <br />i: <br />' v,^ <br />Sf' * t,' <br />rf ■ <br />JV-. <br />hi/' <br />•y :• <br />tv <br />■ i' ■ . <br />■u: • <br />S- <br />‘4 : <br />vf: <br />& <br />fiSr <br />> » * <br />■0t- <br />Kelley asked Mr. Lutz if he has discussed his plans with hxs <br />neighbors oniesch side of him. <br />Lutz indicated that neither neighbor raised objections when <br />Rodwell's filed this application, and to his knowledge there have <br />been no subsequent objections. <br />Gaffron advised that the everyone within 150 fact <br />Lutz property were re-notified of the revised plans submitted by <br />Mr. Lutz. <br />Kelley asked M.:. Lutz to state what he believes are the <br />hardships that support his request for i Variance. <br />Lutz replied, "I view the hardships as being the shape of <br />the lot and the rc-zoning of the property which changed the <br />setback requirements from what was required in 1971 when the <br />house was constructed." <br />Bellows asked Mr. Lutz if it is his intention to keep the <br />screen porch as such, aid not convert it into a room addition. <br />There were no comments from the public pertaining to this <br />application, and Kelley closed the Public: Hearing at 7:09 p.m. <br />Bellows asked whether it may be appropriate to place the <br />applicant on notice that any further upgrade to the screen porch <br />nill require additional approval from the City. <br />Gaffron advised that Staff viewed the screen porch as ^ <br />addition to the house, and that enclosing it within tie roof and <br />wall lines of the screened area should be allowed. <br />Tt was moved by Kelley, seconded bv Cohen, to recommend that <br />Council approve the side setback Variance to construct a <br />three-season porch, and side and rear setback Variances to <br />construct a 7‘6" privacy wall. The hardships on which this <br />recommendation is based are the shape of the lot and the change <br />in zoning. Kelley added that, in his opinion, any further <br />requests for Variances to the rear of the property would not be <br />fsvorably considered. All voted aye. Motion carried. <br />(|4)X0HIH6 FILE #1639-IIILLIAM C. a ELEANOR FERRIL <br />240 monrixLD road <br />^^^^KeUer*n^ted*^at^William and Eleanor Ferril were present, <br />and opened the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m. <br />Gaffron displayed a sketch of the Ferril's <br />greenhouse and reviewed the issues outlined in his Kiy 15, lyyi <br />RI#lQO • <br />Kelley asked Gaffron if there has been any opposition to <br />- 5 - <br />Jl