My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
06-10-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2024 2:20:02 PM
Creation date
6/17/2024 2:17:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
V' <br />1^- <br />I <br />t <br />To:Mayor Peterson & Crono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardsor. <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning s <br />June 3, 1991 <br />r, 1 <br />Zoning <br />#1545 Thomas Lutz, 250 Cygnet Place - Variance - <br />Resolution <br />Zoning District - RR-lB, Single family rural residential, 2 acre, <br />unsewered <br />Application - Request for side setback variance to construct 3- <br />eeason porch, side and rear setback variance for 7' 6" <br />screening wall. <br />List of Bxhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Resolution <br />Planning Commission Minutes of 5/20/91 <br />Planning Commission Action Notice 5/22/91 <br />Memo & Exhibits of 5/13/91 <br />Discuss ii <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of May 13th. Briefly, <br />the applicants are proposing to build a 3-season porch at the <br />rear of their house, although the lot line adjacent to their <br />"rear* yard is technically a side lot line. Applicants are <br />requesting a 21' side setback v9' variance) where a 30' setback <br />normally would be required. <br />Also, applicants propose to construct a deck with platform <br />height 1.5* at the southeast corner of the house. While this <br />deck itself is a non-encroachment, they are proposing a 6 ’ high <br />fence section for privacy above that deck, and attached to the <br />house. This becomes a 7.5' high privacy wall attached to the <br />house which requires it to meet the 30' side setback and 50’ rear <br />setback. A variance of 2' is requested from both the 30' side <br />and 50* rear setback requirements. <br />FlsBBiiig CoasdssioB Re idation <br />At their May meeting. Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to <br />reconsiend approval of variances for both the 3 -season porch and <br />privacy wail. Hardships and justifications noted in Planning <br />CoHMission's recononendation include: <br />a. <br />b. <br />c. <br />The triangular shape of the lot. <br />The change in setback requirements in 1975 after this <br />house w«8 built to the 1 acre zone standards. <br />A low-ievgil deck already exists at the proposed <br />location of the screen porch. <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.