Laserfiche WebLink
■ •V < <br />te. <br />Iv^ <br />” ■■■ail'.f'.v,lUr "• <br />L‘-< ■ <br />yi <br />■2*;‘ <br />'M:f‘■-■mir <br />fitfv.' *. <br />‘ IV’ <br />w <br />V! -i: <br />• r^' • <br />Xf:m. <br />'v-^m- <br />M'i'i'''' <br />to;* ■ <br />•li'. <br />fi'- <br />ir’i ' .'V ^ <br />phk. <br />rbif^rv . <br />'/.i <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 199* <br />OTHBR-STOBBS BAY SEWER CONTINUED ^ „ i^hn <br />Sttwer Committee were present this evening (Candace Ro\/lette, John <br />Thieese). Peterson reported that Committee members *3°"® <br />door-to-door to the individual houses within the proposed Stubbs <br />Ba? sewer area and talked to the residents about the P^o^ect <br />The consensus is that sev;er is a problem and is needed <br />Stubbs Bay area. The majority of people desire to have sewer, <br />but do not wLt to pay for it. He said, "The Committee agrees <br />t.here is a sewer problem and requests that the project be <br />pursued. We would like pursuit of the project to include <br />Sith the City Engineer to better define where sewer is most <br />neided, and where^ it could be stubbed in now with latera s <br />iMtallad at a later time. We would like to see some options in <br />that sense, as well as financing options. If the City could <br />devise some methods of creative financing, it may eliminate <br />future litigation." <br />Jabbour stated that this item must be put on the Agenda of <br />an upcoming Council meeting to be further discussed. <br />Mayor Peterson stated that the actual area has not been <br />officially defined. <br />i.porS;ri"tCoSprehensive Plan refers to this area being sewered, ard Goetten <br />believed it should be done. <br />Butler asked if the City Engineer has studied the area to <br />determine which areas should be included in the project and v/here <br />^he sewer lines should be located. <br />Callahan advised th-t the City Engineer had performed such a <br />study and had reached several conclusions about the area and <br />where the lines should be located. He asked Staff to again <br />provide Council with the City Engineer's findings. <br />Bernhardson further explained that five primary areas for <br />■ si <br />certain properties in that area to "opt-out" of the project. The <br />smaller properties to the east of Leaf Street <br />considered for inclusion in the project because of the <br />area for additional drainfield sites on each property. The <br />residents on Oxford Road were sent a letter asking if <br />like to be included in the project. Inclusion of the <br />Drooerties would result in a $600 reduction off of what <br />liHf sstiMted to be between a $9,000 and $16,000 assessment <br />- 14 - <br />It; <br />fXt!' <br />1“' rl, M