My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-10-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
06-10-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2024 2:46:06 PM
Creation date
6/14/2024 2:45:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
W- <br />% <br />I <br />w. <br />K <br />,ir.': <br /># <br />;^r" <br />h- <br />r-^ <br />'r.fc'^' <br />tm <br />H'p- <br />tJ'- <br />m <br />p- <br />Eip:i:c- <br />Ip-v <br />UW'f <br />mM-ip? <br />^ili.. <br />Mi: <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD JUNE 10, 1991 <br />(tl4)HIGHWAY 12 CORRIDOR CONTINUED <br />upgrade beyond a four-lane highway. I would think at a mininium <br />that the City should be in favor of deleting Highway 55. and <br />County Road 11, and possibly County Road 6 and the south bypass <br />based on an inability for those routes to meet traffic <br />objectives. However the arguments supporting the deletion of <br />County Road 6 and th^ soutn bypass may not be shared by the <br />other conununities. " <br />Sherokee Use asked Council if they were going to take the <br />position for deleting corridors suggested by the City <br />Cministrator. She indicated that the Citizens Group had met <br />with the Long Lake Residents Group. She said, "At the meeting we <br />put together three pages of items to which there was mutual <br />agreement, and three pages of items to which the City of Long <br />Lake disagreed. One of the items in which the City of Long Lake <br />is interested is the idea of shared transportation burden. This <br />means that County Road 6, Highway 12, and Highway 55 would be <br />upgraded and designated to address various aspects of traffic. <br />It seems that mav be one of the main issues that the two groups <br />could agree to, but if we delete Highway 55, that would not be <br />possible. We agreed at the meeting that we would encourage MNDOT <br />to take a serious look at the possibility of upgrading ..oth <br />Highway 55 and Highway 12. I v;ould urge the Council to think <br />hard about Highway 55 to see if we cannot convince MNDOT to look <br />at that option first." <br />Bernhardson stated that upgrading Highway 55 would not pull <br />enough traffic off of Highway 12. The projections are still at <br />25,000. There are traffic problems with the current traffic <br />level on Highway 12, which is 18.000. Bernhardson commented <br />further that if MNDOT spends money to make a link in Delano <br />between Highway 12 and Highway 55 that they would be reluctant to <br />spend additional funds to do any additional upgrades to Highway <br />12. <br />(f^yor Peterson indicated that she had met with Larry Dallam <br />and his comments echoed those just made by Bernhardson. Highway <br />55 is too far north to pull traffic off of Hiahway 12, and for <br />that reason. Highway 55 is not a viable route. <br />stated that she is leery of using MNDOT’s rationale and <br />that there are still many questions to be answered about traffic <br />levels on Highway 12. <br />Goetten stated that it may not be wise for the City to take <br />n position on deleting any routes other than the south bypass if <br />it is to have successful negotiations with the City of Long Lake, <br />fhe said, *It is true we have been getting some negative feedback <br />about the shared transportation burden option, but perhaps that <br />^ill he the final resolution. Even though it may be true that <br />Highway 55 will not take enough traffic from Highway 12, there <br />- 10 -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.