05-28-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e:* fhr.I" h-^^'h- >■■ -' r '• % I':fr wr I.MCD Doarcl of Directors April 24, 1991 executed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) between the two parties. The City objects to the issusnce or tne license. . . . . Martinson reported from contacts with city orriciais that there is some question as to whether or not a current CUP is in effect with regard to the property. There are two pre-existing CUP’S. and a proposed CUP. The city is anxious to resolve the differences between the city and the Wayzata Yacht Club. There is some question as to conditions of the 'old" CUP which create navigational problems with the channel at the public launch area. Martinson continued. The city believes there will be improvements for use of the public channel with the new GUP, and therefore Martinson recommended the action on the license at this time be tabled. wvrMotion: Martinson moved. Rascop seconded, to table the WYC applications to allow the city and WYC to work out the CUP differences. Motion carried. , *u The Board subsequently agreed to allow discussion on the motion to table. Discussion: Hurr asked if the LMCD code requires proper zoning for a license of this kind. LeFevere replied that all the code requires is that the applicant submit as part of the application a demonstration as to compliance with Jurisdictions. Foster suggested LeFevere submit more detailed comments in writing. a. ^ Cochran noted time constraints with the rapid approach of the boating season and the need to make decisions on licenses. Slocum mentioned people are in the audience who could speak on the subject of the CUP and WYC relations with the City of Philip Cole, WYC Counsel, stated the Club has the proper zoning and is in total compliance with their CUP. Such a delay poses a hardship on the 127 people who keep their boats at the WYC. Grathwol invited the Board to reconsider the tabling motion. Reese spoke in favor of re-opening the motion to table. Motion: Babcock moved, Bartos seconded, to reconsider the motion to table the Wc zata Yacht Club license renewal application. Motion carrie.^. . . - Discussion: Hurr asked WYC attorney Cole to respond if they have the proper zoning, because it seems to be in conflict with the Wayzata mayor's letter. Cole re.sponded that the Wayzata letter is incorrect, that both Club properties are in an R-2 zone. WYC was issued a CUP in 1974 to operate the Club at its "Shoreline Property" (Site 1). The property has never been altered, has never had another hearing on that conditional^^ use permit. Another property at HWY 16 and 101 is the "Bell Property", a supplemental parking lot. The 1976 CUP on that property as a parking lot carries a number of stipulations as to plantings, shrubbery, and a 400’ perimeter on the buoy field and 127 boat limit on the moorings (total licensed watercraft storage). In the summer of ’90 the city granted a temporary water exception to the CUP to go out beyond 400* through November, ’90. At that same time the city also modified