My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-28-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
05-28-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2024 2:10:25 PM
Creation date
6/14/2024 2:06:44 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 13, 1991 <br />(#16)CITY FACILITIES CONTINUED <br />Crystal B:y, Minnetonka, aid i =; signed by a Lewis F. Page. <br />Anderson asked Council if they have studi.id the records <br />pertaining to the title of the City Hail property, and stated <br />that perhaps nothing else can be done with the property. <br />Rich Wysocki expressed concern regarding the effect the 12 <br />inch well installed on the exist! ic site, should it be chosen, <br />would have on other wells in the area. <br />Jabbour advised Mr. Wysocki that t.he well would only be <br />utilized in the case of a fire. <br />site. <br />Norm Paurus again urged Council to consider the e;;isting <br />Goetten stated that it is sometimes difficult for people to <br />accent change. She said, ‘*I think Council would be extremely <br />Si.ort-3ighted if wr: selected the existing site and the sewer <br />plant property on Old Crystal Bay Road. whatever facilities we <br />do construct, will have to last and be adequate to serve for a <br />long time. I do not agree with tne aspe*.t of granting <br />cm^aglvgs Variances for this property. Sriould Council select the <br />Highway 12 site, that does not mean we are going to construct an <br />enormous, fancy facility. We are planning a residential-style <br />building in keeping with Orono's rural character. The City of <br />Orono is growing, and it is the property north of Highway 1.2 t lat <br />is being developed. If it were possible to construct all of the <br />facilities on this location, I would be in favor of that. <br />However, that is not the case, and in my opinion, the Highw.ay 12 <br />best suites our needs now and for the futv*. I base that <br />opinion on the various reasons that have bean discussed this <br />evening, as well as the fact that it does not m.i-’ sense to <br />locate a new facility in a residential area. Such j facility <br />belongs in an area that has other quasi-commerical facilities.” <br />Butler indicated that she agrer!d wholeheartedly with <br />Councilmember Goetten's opinion. <br />Callahan stated that he, and Mayor Peterson, had favored the <br />existing site from the beginning of this process, and that for <br />the most part, h»a had based his opinion on Cvost factors. He <br />said, ’’After Council had voted to exercise the option on the <br />Highway 12 site, I became uncertain about the costs, and though I <br />still favored this site, there w.as the associated problem of <br />locating the public works department. I do not object tc having <br />a split site, nor do I see the need to grant Variances for this <br />.site as a problem. Due to the decaying nature of the existing <br />public works building, it is imperative that we do whatever is <br />necessary to provide an alternate facility. Such a facility will <br />not fit on this site, so it would be necessary to purchase other <br />property, or locate it on the Crystal Bay sewer plant property. <br />- 12 - <br />. . . . -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.