Laserfiche WebLink
•m .3r -=i if:-f •£■ <br />shall become null and void unless work <br />thereon i g underlay within cne year o£ the <br />issuance of sucF* permit by the zoning <br />administrator• <br />(Eznoiiaa is addad.) <br />B. Minneapolis, Minn., Code of ordinances S 534.410 (1988), <br />whicl provides: <br />In anv case where a conditional use has not <br />been established within one year after the <br />4ate of granting thereof, then <br />further action by the conrmission, or the city <br />council, the conditional use or authorization <br />shall be null and void . <br />(Emphasis added.) <br />C. Minneapolis, Minn • f Code of Ordinances 5 522.170 (1975), <br />which provides: <br />A conditional use permit shall be deemed to <br />authorise only one particular conditional use <br />and shall expire if the conditional use shall <br />eaaae for more than one year for anv reason. <br />(Emphasis added.) <br />was underway within one year of the issuance of <br />the conditional use permit, as required by section 522.160, and <br />whether a use was -established- within one year, as required by <br />section 534.410, need not be considered in this case. Wo conclude <br />the conditional use permit expired under section 522.170, because <br />the conditional use, even if established, ceased for more than one <br />year <br />issued a conditional use permit to L.C.A. on January <br />25, 1985. Construction could not commence until issues relating <br />to the easements were resolved. Litigation ensued in 1987 and was <br />- a -