05-28-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORCNC CITY :ccmc:l meeting riELE a?r:^ :i.■ • J a ' fir' 5 • 2tr.3.“ uir3 LZ 114ZGBZZM^AN IZNTZ 'i'.’ZZ — ^ 3 I. *»* 3 — ^ — -^ -. — .« ^ • >.. — ^ B3rr3-~ r3C-i33r 'Tr.3 l3r.3 ls3 Zz33-i-3s ir. ’!ir.n3S3“3 aid in fac“ require, us re zi_e ^eneieiena- -oS ?er~ — j Che land. '.Je have else creviied cnac cne ::a_ver , ..n-un .ir. ^ "S •.vCU-3 Sir ., ' -j * -fc To uiisti sxisr.if sny sucs^rusriw pur'w.i3S3- -s on noiioe o ihe condiiion. It was moved by BuiisTf seconded by Goeiierif to aocpt Resolution #2953 r and^ accept tne changes that have bean made by the applicant's attorney. Motion, Ayes-5, Mayor Peterson, Callahan. Nay. Motion passed. (#4) ZONING FILE #1629-MCNUi.TY CONSTRUCTION 1700 FOX STREET VARIANCE James McNulty, Huq.h .Mac.Milian, Duncan Taylor. Attorney, were present. MacMillan,Jack Sernhardson stated that based on action take.n by Ccunci- at their April 8, 1991, meeting, a denial resolution is being presented for Council's review tnis evening. He notf^-d that the City Attorney's office had only a opportunity to review this resolution, and suggested tnat Council may wish to tao...e this matter. Mavor Paterson asked Jack Tay_or it .ne '.vou — c _ —.<0 ■—.unu —— table or oroceed with this applic_ticn. Taylor stated that his clients would prefer to proceed, and he aske*d for t.he opportunity to make a few brier stateme.nts. ^ He said, "There are t.hree factors I would ask Council to consider. ^ the City has adopted no poliwV wiwh respe^w -o lot coverace for a orincioal residence on lots exceeding two acres. As was the case in 1937, ar.d is still true toaay, t.hasa improvements '•jf. 1.d have been made to the principal structure. In 1987. Council 1.. find sufficient hardship to merit a~proval of the Variances requ^a-uced. I believe those hardships, set fo^-th in Resolution #2204, still exist today. Based on the 1937 apt^rovai, the applicant constructed the building in accordance with requirements and conditions. What we now have, .as applied this Variance, is a piece of p.roperty and improvements t.hat, comply with the Zoning Ordinance. Based on the action taken by Council in 1987, and what the applicant agreed to in 1987, with regard to restrictions, this property is now truly unique The accessory building has been operational for two years, and .lere have been no adverse consequences to t.he neighborhood. We feel these factors need to be considered by Council when they make their decision. - 6 -