05-13-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ssisxsss srr sTiTssr^ rnsr,s^"=^'K iSS u raa,^ IIM model tom Uie »pi)«i(ll» at i»e Long Tenn Mumgemeni Finn »nd plnced in ihe moon* ttat will ko nwdo omlloblo to oocli city. If a dtyi ihoraland ordlnince to In atria «^™ity with DNKAoNlnnd lundardt, tho city could pioceed to adopt the ordinnnce and aubmlt It t^ho UNR tot ftvitw tad tppraval without deity, tlthough It does not need to do so until December 10,199Z. If a dtv dedfCt to tdopi i ihoreland ordlnince that Is not in strict conformity, it must solicit input firora the nubile tad other ifllDCted govemmeavil bodies. In addition, the altemitlve ihoreliad controls must ^ inn^or dJuppioved i •djieeni like dues. Tltc DNR interpreuUon of lu rules suggest that the ”lDDfOvil or dlnpproval by adjacent lake dries* doa not obligate the DNR Commissioner to app^ or diaw^ the eSnuillve ordinance Unguage, although the Commlutoner wiU undoubtedly consider the of adjacent dries In final determination on any alternative language proposals. Tlie LMCD has aareed to serve aa a conduit for DNR grant ftinds to dries, which DNR sought as a means of lowerltti In irut •dministratton costs and reducing staff time devoted to grant administration. In return aaiviai in this lole, the LMCD wUl receWe a grant from DNR for $15,000. The grant will be used to offset , tdninistfatlve expenses (estimated to be at leut $3,000.00) Involved in servfns aa a conduit andiir them a lotwoe for hiring a consultant to assist member aues wii ^ ^ oidhiaa^pattlculariy any variations from stria conformity to the DNR shoreland ordinance standards. Ihe LMCDh aaraemem with DNR creates a Technical (fommiiiee to be made up of one city suff or §t§ff penon fron cAch city (or elected ofllclAi) {MnUlAf with lind use end zoning Issues Htv*i ihofilAiid minAgemem ordinance and propoa^ for alternative shordand management standards. It k that the TeemUcal Committee wiu perform a technical review of Individual dty tltemarives to the itifct DNR ahoieland standards. The Committee might make recommendations to the sponaorlng dty for alteraaie frrg«*g*, or simply identify Issues that it beUeves may result from the propowd Unguage. In any event, the rAmmtttmm win have no approval or disapproval authority over the proposed ordinances. FbUowini comDietlon of the Committoo’s work, each shoreland ordinance that contains alternative stand^ win aeed to he snbinitted to all lake dries and any other affected adjacent dri« tor their review as required under DNR rulm. It Is hoped that the Technical Oommiitee will be able to resolve outstanding Issues smong aUowlttg the epproval process by adjacent dries to occur without oontrovetiy. tha f MfT> fe i^Meislna the u*rM.ra In its egreement with DNR to determine whether changes can be made that win an 14 driea to enter into • joint agreement with DNR, allowing the LMCD to conrinuew seme as a condalt for the money as the DNR originally Intended, while assuring aU of the dilea that LMCD a role ii supportive to and not oontroUing of the dries. WLMBD i«4Sii*