Laserfiche WebLink
t- <br />^ L «.1 I <br />ORONO POSITION STATEMENT <br />PREFACE <br />o A majority of the 14 cities' .bjectives and L.'!CD overall <br />objectives are not mutually exclusive. An agreed upon <br />philosophy must be a basis to develop a common vision and <br />resolve the major issues prior to redraft of the plan. <br />PURPOSE AND GOALS <br />LMCD is in the best position of any agency to serve a <br />coordination role and planning agency for environmental <br />protection of the lake. The LMCD should refrain from <br />OV0T t.h0 shorf^lsiid. DNR individudl <br />cities are best suited for this responsibility. <br />Management Program should clearly define who <br />authority for each objective. <br />has the <br />ISSUES <br />Surface Water: <br />The usable, navigatabl^^ acreag*^ to calculate p*^ak density on <br />the lake should be adjusted annually based on tlie lake level <br />and reduced by impediments such as milfoil. <br />The DNR should be responsible for the acquisition of off- <br />street properties to provide better proximity for public <br />access and safety without acquiring existing homesteaded <br />properties. <br />The LMCD Plan should establish a maximum average and peak <br />density and should undertake measures so that these maximums <br />are not exceeded. <br />To implement the <br />proposed: <br />issues identified above, the following is <br />A.Li^nl^ing increase in boats using the lake by controlling any <br />increased access (which it has the authority to do). <br />B.Only allow increased access after increased enforcement of <br />stricter controls and other implemented measures have proven <br />effective to limit problems on the lake.