My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
05-13-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2024 12:33:06 PM
Creation date
6/11/2024 12:28:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VJUtlARCBS RBQOIRBD <br />Lot Area <br />Setback Variances ( <br />Lot Width <br />Front <br />Hardcover <br />Side X Rear) <br />Other <br />HARDSHIP <br />Due to Che unusual shape of the property, the current floor plan of <br />Che residence and ICs exisCing location on the lot, this is the only feasible <br />way an addition can be conscructed. <br />DESCRIPTION OF UNUSUAL PROPERTY CONDITIONS <br />The exisCing 12' X 12’-6" lon^ deck which has been their since 1984, <br />is 8 feet from the property line. Thi.“ deck replaced a considerably larger deck <br />which ran along Che entire length or Che residence approximately 13 feet wide <br />by 45 feet long. The building foundation, built approximately 1968 at its <br />closest point is 11 feet from the property line. At no point will the three <br />season porch be any closer to the property line then the existing deck is. The <br />bathroom addition will be further away from the property line chan the existing <br />dock is at its closest point. <br />The existing property between my east property line and Pence Lane <br />(driveway) was determined \inbuildable by the planning commission in the early <br />eighties. The only buildable lot. for a family member only^ Is to the east of <br />PENCE Lane, because of this decision there will always be a large buffer of <br />greenspace between my residence and any future construction. I am also under the <br />Impression that another part of the agreement between the city and the former <br />property owner was chat when he was allowed to remodel 2702 Walters Port, he was <br />Co deed a portion of this green space, which he also owned at that time to this <br />lot. This lot would Chen comply with your current zoning regulations, <br />unfortunately to the best of my knowledge, this was never done. <br />4 I <br />V
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.