Laserfiche WebLink
-.r <br />uh.n .hould the work be completed? I£ tne Planning Commission <br />Council feel that applicant should share in the costs • <br />SJlvate culvert uMcadS project, then the other two directly <br />owners must also agree to spend money at this time.... <br />needs to be some agreement cn all sides In <br />ordmr^tot this upflcade to happen privately. If the neighboring <br />SJjSirtw owne?s UsUt that the project become a public project, <br />shared all banmfitting property owners, whether their benefit <br />then th. .tt.nd.nt costs of such . prol«t <br />will undoobtably rise. <br />Staff rmcommeadatloa <br />Staff would reco^end approval of the lot area variance renewal <br />finding that: <br />A. There is no additional land available for purchase to <br />sake this a conforming parcel. <br />B. The lot area is consistent with that of other <br />developed lota in the neighborhood. <br />C. The variance was previously granted in 19B0. <br />0. Sewer la available and has been assessed for a total <br />of one unit. <br />the need for further variances. <br />Approval is subject to: <br />I, setbacks of 35 feet from the west, south and east lot <br />Xines and IS feet from the north lot line. <br />2. Payment of park fee of $198.sa at the time a building <br />permit is issued. <br />3 Leoal combination of all four lots into one tax <br />parcal must be filed end accepted by Hennepin County <br />prior to iaauance of a building permit. <br />r e <br />filT'* -V'-V*. <br />h.'': *■ • <br />ywnpv-.^^. *i. .... V <br />5. Applicant shall grant a drainage easement over the <br />westerly and southarly If fast of the property^ <br />^^^ImDCOvamenta to tha property may not abamte* tbm .. <br />^drain^e pattern in the nelghborbo^. <br />share In the costa and shall •***7.i;_^*** <br />undern^th the driveway serving the two pfopectlM-to^^ <br />r <br />- --- - -- '1 <br />'M * ifa*'w.,%