Laserfiche WebLink
ssjssr, «. c*'?.. p«p.rty. <br />XtM XXX* Site Planning <br />n* mriV Aloe*t*d to avoid th* oalatind **ptic ayat**. Th* <br />eweteket hc*u«e is redesigned slightly* <br />eK**e 1 eshibits no apparent changes. Sheet 3 indicates the <br />M^taji la tadMlsoad to inelud. a tuckond.r |.p.<i*, no* <br />3.1eeel total instead of 2. <br />A allows sections through the site froai Pok Streetp <br />•SlcatlnV thl “«i"hat pa.aln, .otoplat. «o«ld .ncoont.p <br />toeard the tennis facility. <br />teeo that the aoplicantc have attempted to screen the <br />!Sd dri»*»ay tath.r than ^■V**‘rrptrt**lly due to concerns expressed by Mr. ncHUiryp appxAvanv. <br />hoildert <br />2) Moving the structure near the <br />voalO dasiage the architectural character of the eein <br />as would attachmnte <br />WECO <br />me evplleent hea provided information <br />ese of the exiating residence and has proposed specific controls <br />00 ^Ii0 use of tho proposed tennis facility* <br />eiameine Cowlseion is sked to first determine on the basis of <br />e|ie facta preaented by staff and applicantp whether there it a <br />alfeifieeat hardship to justify granting of the variance of the <br />sttfaitttde requested. <br />eeeepteble* <br />Thirdiyp then Planning Commission should andproposed specified controls on future use of the structure and <br />the property ere appropriate. <br />fe.< <br />‘•vV*, <br />•"1 <br />f V <br />miu <br />m <br />i .