Laserfiche WebLink
K£ . • <br />OF T8B RBCULAR ORONO COONCIL MBBTINC BBLD MAY 11» 1987 <br />I1U9 <br />170P coHom <br />INCMI NAaaLLAN <br />A 08B n Prvsftnt for this nsttor wers: Jawsi McMulty of McNulty <br />Construction: Consultant Planner Edward Rasok of <br />Dahlgren, Shardlow, Uban: Attorney Todd 0. Andrews: <br />Duncan MacMillan; and other nenbers of the MacMillan <br />family. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />n variance and conditional use permit to construct a <br />caretaker house and a 16f000 a.f* (in floor area) <br />recreational faeilityr most of which consists of and <br />indoor tennis court. He noted that the attorney for the <br />MacMillan's has submitted a list of their hardships. <br />One question is whether the construction of this <br />facility may or may not be out of line with this <br />particular sizeable property. Secondly# it mey not <br />reach the level of hardships, however unique, to justify <br />^he variances. Because of these questions, staff <br />recosmends possibly looking at an ordinance to regulate <br />accessory structures over 1000 s.f. by the use of a <br />condit.- si use permit. <br />Mr. McNulty explained the proposed landscaping in order <br />to minimise the effect ihat the difficulty in lotion <br />of the the recreational facility due to the soils and <br />slopes• <br />Mr. Rasek further explained the careful planning <br />involved in the final proposed location of the facility <br />and their plans for two levels of 12»-1«* pine trees to <br />accomplish year around natural screening. <br />Mr. Duncan MacMillan explained that this property has <br />been in their family for over 60 yedrs and has remained <br />basically the same during this period of time and do not <br />plan or desire to change the nature of the property. He <br />stated that the intent of the recreational facility is <br />strictly for family use noting they have taken great <br />care, including filing a covenant pertaining to the use, <br />to avoid any concerns from the community. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter. <br />CcunciImembor Goetten questioned the location of the <br />caretaker residence as opposed to being more centrally <br />located. <br />Mr* McNulty stated that proposed location seemed the <br />most logical for maintenance functions and security. <br />•vet <br />. V • <br />9|«