Laserfiche WebLink
luiHS ummZoning File #1629 <br />March 11, 1991 <br />Page 2 cf 4 <br />3. <br />4. <br />I’’- ^ <br />Note the following facts <br />A. Setbacks: Existing <br />and figures: <br />ProDosed Required Variance <br />Front 143.2'Nc Chang*»SO' min. <br />Rear 425'415'50' min. <br />Left Side 266'252'30' min. <br />B. Height:Although no elevation view was submitted , the <br />e <br />ITOOi. pxdn xiiUJLv^au^a »»-u * -u — <br />building and less than 30' height limitation. <br />C. Footprint Area: (Lot area = 13.5 acres) <br />- Footprint per plan approved by Council <br />in Resolution #2204 <br />- Footprint as built, 1988 <br />- Footprint proposed 1991 <br />- Allowed footprint, individual <br />accessory structure <br />12,600 s.f. <br />12,100 s.f. <br />14,090 s.f. <br />3,000 s.f. <br />D. Total of Footprint Areas: <br />Total allowed combined accessory structure <br />footprints <br />Total existing combined accessory structure <br />footprints <br />Total proposed combined accessory structure <br />footprints <br />6,000 s.f. <br />13,828 s.f. <br />15,818 s.f. <br />The existing tennis court structure was approved by the <br />Council per Resolution #2204, adopted June 22, 1987. <br />Variances granted in that resolution include: <br />A. Exceeding 1,000 s.f. floor area (16,875 s.f. total floor <br />area, included the first and second floor). <br />B. Nearer front lot line than principal structure on <br />property. <br />C. Height of 33' defined/40' peak, exceeding 30' defined <br />height limitation. <br />Condition #2 of Resolution #2204 required that a covenant be <br />executed by the property owners, with the following <br />provisions: <br />A. No commercial use. <br />B. Adequate screening from road and neighbors. <br />C. Access from private driveway only (no new curb cuts). <br />Jl