My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
04-22-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2024 11:33:42 AM
Creation date
6/10/2024 11:26:19 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
761
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
James A. and Patricia M. Mitchell <br />2685 north Shore Drive <br />Uayiata, Minnesota 55391 <br />March 12, 1991 <br />mar 19 .isai <br />^ 4 <br />Orono Planning Commission <br />Crystal Bay, Minnesota S5S23 <br />Me: 02626 - Tim and Beth Traff variance application <br />26B3 North Shore Drive <br />Ladies and Centlemen: <br />On March 18, 1991 you will be asked to consider a side yard setback <br />variance requested by Tin and Beth Traff for construction of a new <br />residence at 2683 North Shore Drive, next door to our residence at <br />2685 North Shore Drive. Since we will be out of town on March 18, <br />1991 we will be represented at the Planning Comission meeting by our <br />attorney Robert Mitchell. The purpose of this letter is to tell you <br />that we oDDose your granting this variance, to point out three factu <br />al inaccuracies in the Traff s' application and to explain why we <br />think the variance requested should not be granted. <br />first, the application states "both neighbors on the east and west <br />side of the house approve of our plans". That is not true. Not only <br />do we not approve of the Traffs' proposed plans, we did net even see <br />the plans until after they were filed with the city. Tim mentioned <br />to us that he would be requesting a variance and told us that he <br />would ask for a letter of approval. He never, however, asked us to <br />sign such a letter. <br />The second factual inaccuracy in the application is the statement <br />that "There is no question that a new house in the middle of the <br />property and using IS-foot variances enhances the land and neighbor <br />ing hemes. There is no crowding or encroaching on the neighboring <br />homes," Nhile the current small house at 2683 North Shore Drive dees <br />not necessarily enhance our property, putting a different, laroer (in <br />volume) house fiZflllC to ours obviously will detract from the value of <br />our property, not enhance it. <br />The third Inaccuracy in the application is the suggestion that Orono <br />will cause the Traffs a hardship if Orono does not grant this vari- <br />wet. Me are delighted that Tim and Beth are expecting a child, but <br />suggest that they could simply move into the home that they own <br />directly across the street if space is what they desire. <br />In 1984 we bought one of the oldest homes in Orono. Since then we <br />have worked and studied to maintain and preserve the historic <br />charcter and natural elegance of our home and this area. He treasure <br />OroM s nlling open spaces and wetlands and the 2-acre zoning which <br />guards the openness and the lovely views of the lake from the street <br />along the north side of Crystal Bay.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.