Laserfiche WebLink
i-. <br />;>■- <br />r <br />PLANNING COIiMISSION MEETING (RE-CONVENE) HELD MARCH 20, 1991 <br />(#8)ZONING FILE #1626-TRAFF CONTINUED <br />Planning Commission if they would recommend approval o. a lot <br />width and area Variance, if all ocher requirements J”®;; <br />stated that she would recommend approvax or a lot w^ath <br />and area Variance because the hardship runs with the land because <br />the Citv recognized the lot an 2ii*cabie, anc i- ..s sewe.e-. <br />Hanson agreed.' Motion, Ayes-3. Kelley. Nay. Motion carried. <br />(19)ZONING FILE ♦1627-SAM MCCLOUD <br />RECORD LOT #22, BIG ISLAND <br />AFTER-THE-FACT VARIANCES-CONTINDATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />It was moved by Hanson, seconded by Bellows, to table <br />application #1627, as requested by the applicant. Motion, <br />Ay^s<>4, Nays“0. Motion carried. <br />(#10)ZONING FILE #1620-SARA a MARK FINNEY <br />4195 HIGBNOOD ROAD <br />VARIANCE-CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING <br />Sara Finney was present. <br />Kelley re-convened the Public Hearing at 4:36 p.m., and <br />reviewed the Plannina Commission's viev/s regarding this <br />application and the intent of the average lakeshore setback. <br />Hanson asked Mabusth if Staff had been able to view tne <br />lakeshore structure comprised of retaining wails, and a stairway. <br />Mabusth replied, "We were unable to meet Sara on-site, but <br />did have an opportunity to discuss the structure v/ith her. T_»ere <br />is a deck which would appear to not meat the City s safety <br />landing standards. The structure is approximately eight to ten <br />years old. It may be appropriate for tha Planning Commission to <br />include in their recommendation a statement pertaining to <br />structure being recognized as a non-conforming structure. _ • <br />City cannot guarantee that the applicants will bo aliowec to <br />rebuild the deck at such time that it deteriorates, and any <br />Structural repairs that are deemed necessary will have to a <br />approved by the City." <br />Hanson was concerned about treating this non-conforming <br />structure in a manner different than the way such structures are <br />normally addressed, though he fully understood the innocence o.. <br />the Finney's and the owners of the property prior to them. <br />Bellows asked what mnasures the City will take to assure <br />that the Finney's and any other owners of this property <br />understand the restrictions regarding the lakeshore str..cture. <br />Mabusth stated that the resolution would include language <br />- 5 -